Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Partial\s+Exchanges\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: Partial Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 06:54:02 +0200
In the CQWW rules it stipulates clearly that one has to exchange "RS/RST report plus zone". Why not play by the rules? In this case you clearly should have been DQ&acute;ed. You might call it a irrel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00064.html (10,600 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Partial Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <paul@ei5di.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 20:19:29 +0100
I'm trying to draw attention to a specific aspect of the rules which I believe is no longer relevant. CQWW, and other major international contests, have not kept up with the times with regard to the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00066.html (10,746 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Partial Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 03:02:02 +0000
No, I doubt very seriously that is the case. The more probably reason is that your contest software put the 59 or whatever in place automatically, and the people you worked had their software do the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00067.html (9,555 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Partial Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:14:10 -0400
No, it seems you weren't caught. Didn't you say that your log reflected sent reports, but you added a narrative comment that you didn't sent a report unless requested? If so, you submitted a false lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00068.html (11,257 bytes)

5. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: Partial Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:13:19 +0300
In CQWW, has anyone been penalised for incorrect received Zone? In CQ WPX, has anyone received zero points (been penalised) by incorrect received QSO number? In WAE (Worked All Europe), has anyone ev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00069.html (10,611 bytes)

6. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: Partial Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: "James Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:59:00 -0700
WHY are we even responding to what this lid thinks is a cutesy way to make up his own rules? If he doesn't like any contest's format, may I suggest he go create his own contest, rules, judging, heada
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00080.html (12,756 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu