Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Stealth\s+Rules\s+Changes\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: Stealth Rules Changes (score: 1)
Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth Earl Harker)
Date: Wed Dec 10 23:12:31 1997
Thus spoke Jim Stahl: I noticed this, too. I've tried to round up as many multi-operator efforts as I've been able to for the club station, but previously it had been my understanding that it was OK
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00231.html (14,152 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Re: Stealth Rules Changes (score: 1)
Author: ramco@netsync.net (THOMAS G. MOTT W2DRZ)
Date: Thu Dec 11 01:35:31 1997
K HMMMMMMMMM very interesting !!!!! did not catch the rule change, must be some people objected to single ops TXING on 5 bands at the same time with 5 recievers listening on each band as I used to do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00232.html (8,701 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Re: Stealth Rules Changes (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Thu Dec 11 08:46:17 1997
I dont think those are new rules. As a single operator entry in any contest (for quite some time now due to past abuses), you have not been allowed to transmit more than one signal at a time. That do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00238.html (11,315 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Re: Stealth Rules Changes (score: 1)
Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth Earl Harker)
Date: Thu Dec 11 14:01:39 1997
Thus spoke tgstewart@pepco.com: This has been true for _HF_ contests for a long time, but if you read the rules for this past September VHF QSO Part (August QST, p. 101), there is no such restriction
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00250.html (10,153 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu