Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+WPX\s+rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+WPX\s+rules\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: WPX rules (score: 1): Author: rocker@datasync.com (Ray Rocker); Date: Sun Feb 28 13:07:32 1999; Yeah, just like that IARU Stateside QSO Party they have in July. (funny, I seem to have a lot of DX in my log for THAT contest; maybe I'm just weird because I prefer 5 point QSOs to 1-pointers) -- R; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-02/msg00032.html (6,952 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: WPX rules (score: 1): Author: rocker@datasync.com (Ray Rocker); Date: Sun Feb 28 13:07:32 1999; Yeah, just like that IARU Stateside QSO Party they have in July. (funny, I seem to have a lot of DX in my log for THAT contest; maybe I'm just weird because I prefer 5 point QSOs to 1-pointers) -- R; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-02/msg00059.html (6,476 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: WPX rules (score: 1): Author: ums@nconnect.net (Gary Sutcliffe); Date: Mon Mar 1 16:15:55 1999; I think the rule change is good. I plan on operating my first WPX in probably 15 years because of the rule change. I have not operated in a long time for a number of reasons, but primarily didn't lik; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00006.html (7,250 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Re: WPX rules (score: 1): Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike Nash, NO6X); Date: Mon Mar 1 22:37:37 1999; Well I have been reading this thread with some intrest here as WPX is by far my favorite contest. It makes no difference to me how the scoring goes to me, but let me make a remark about it being call; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00012.html (8,028 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Re: WPX rules (score: 1): Author: thompson@pcsoftintl.com (Randy Thompson); Date: Wed Mar 3 01:48:39 1999; Yes, WPX is ruined now - not! Instead of 3 guys in the USA trying to win, there might be 10 or so. The WPX is a great contest because of the international activity. It has never received much respect; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00020.html (8,357 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Re: WPX rules (score: 1): Author: gussam@newcomm.net (Gus Samuelson); Date: Wed Mar 3 14:19:01 1999; IMHO the WPX will now be better !! The gold mine of great USA pxs can only now grow due to increased activity. When WE9 or KU7 are just as good as VU2 ( point diff ) adding more only improves the sit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00026.html (7,707 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Re: WPX rules (score: 1): Author: felipe@isla.net (Felipe J. Hernandez); Date: Wed Mar 3 13:59:01 1999; ufff... Ive always thought that the new WPX rules would affect negatively the contest....to this point I still dont know, but this message out of the previous 5 thousand received in the past year or; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00028.html (7,619 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]