Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+self\-spotting\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "nick" <vk1aa@tpg.com.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:30:46 -0700
David, it is obvious that all 4 spots are from the same person, who ever he may be. The fact we share same ISP means nothing. 4 fake spots on 100K Q's is not bad; and even more important - definitely
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00297.html (14,024 bytes)

2. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:48:25 -0600
Let's not mix apples and oranges here. The issue of self spotting is related to contests not general operating. Participants claiming to be unassisted yet they get spotted repeatedly by bogus calls a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00303.html (16,189 bytes)

3. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:57:17 -0000
I didn't realize this one was sent to the reflector or I would have answered it to there. operating. by the Out actually Those half spots with ???, as I explained in my direct reply to nick, are obvi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00305.html (18,409 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:01:04 -0600
Mark, You might be right on that point. I would have seriously wonder about sending spots but not receiving them. I guess it would be no different than a guy claiming to be unassisted while all along
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00308.html (18,311 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:32:34 EDT
Yup, lots of times my rate gets a big bump when I am spotted and I am only a lowly K4. it's fun to go back after the contest and check DXSummit to see where the "bumps" took place as a result of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00309.html (8,944 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "vk1aa" <vk1aa@tpg.com.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:34:46 +1000
The point I am trying to make : a/ some people out there - including K1TTT - are extremely obsessed with spotting and slef appointed spot policing; always ready to point finger to "cheaters" with or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00310.html (10,397 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
at least i supply evidence rather than just pointing fingers only if you don't know how to use them sharing is good, and it is amazing the information available from watching world wide spots during
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00319.html (10,901 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:11:19 -0500
I am one of many people who really appreciates what K1TTT has been doing. It has been clear to many of us for years and years now that there has been a fair amount of cheating via cleverly-disguised
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00321.html (11,980 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:58:21 +0100
roughly translated means: "A hunter who knows how to hunt hunts without his dog." 73, de Hans, K0HB/4ID -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00322.html (9,642 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:48:00 -0400 (EDT)
from me... A hunter who wants to have more fun takes both his dog and his friends along. -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DV
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00323.html (9,618 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:17:00 -0800
As I have sat on the sidelines observing, with no dog in this fight, it has seemed to me that K1TT is primarily supplying evidence, and allowing the readers to draw their own conclusions. Yes he does
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00325.html (12,326 bytes)

12. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:08:55 -0000
Let me tell you a story about dxsummit. A few years ago when I started analyzing spots from the cluster all I could do was statistics on the calls that made spots from dxsummit. Knowing that web ser
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00333.html (11,462 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: n9qqk@urbancom.net
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:18:18 -0500
Dave. If peer pressure brought about by your statistics causes some packet cheaters to mend their ways, then you should be commended for your efforts. However, when you start talking about DQ'ing bas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00345.html (8,683 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu