Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+ts\-850\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+ts\-850\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: ts-850 (score: 1): Author: k5ka@earthlink.net (Ken Adams); Date: Tue Aug 27 23:04:17 2002; the computer age for the stone age. So here are some questions. First of all, you have acquired a great contest radio! one but I see this recieve antenna mod. Is that just for recieve or can you tran; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00276.html (8,342 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: ts-850 (score: 1): Author: kn5h@earthlink.net (KN5H); Date: Wed Aug 28 21:07:11 2002; Sean: For what its worth. We took 2 rigs on a contest-pedition 2 years ago, an 850 and a 570. The bad news was the 850 went QRT. The worse news was we had to use the 570. It sucked. The next year I w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00299.html (9,526 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: ts-850 (score: 1): Author: SunGodX@cox.net (Dennis Younker NE6I); Date: Wed Aug 28 22:09:29 2002; Lots of people yakking about the 570 not being up to snuff as a contest rig. Oddly, no details are being presented. Anyone care to detail? 570. band; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00300.html (10,733 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Re: ts-850 (score: 1): Author: bob@cytanet.com.cy (Bob Henderson); Date: Thu Aug 29 14:20:43 2002; Dennis My twopence or is it 2 cents worth. The 570 is a nice rig. I've used it on several DXpeditions with great success BUT I agree that it doesn't quite come up to snuff as a serious contest rig. W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00305.html (12,549 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Re: ts-850 (score: 1): Author: k9mi@arrl.net (Michael Brown); Date: Thu Aug 29 09:24:01 2002; Main problem is AGC pumping and selectivity. In a contest, you're always going to have QRM. The ability to copy a signal thru the QRM in an 850 is much better, at least in my experiences, then the 57; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00306.html (11,312 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Re: ts-850 (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Thu Aug 29 22:53:32 2002; Dennis Younker NE6I brings up a valid question. Two years ago, almost to this week, my house (not the antennas) were struck my lightning and it took out an IC751A and TS870. I purchased another TS870; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00323.html (8,256 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Re: ts-850 (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Fri Aug 30 11:18:22 2002; Many contesters and DXers have recommended the TS-850 to me as one of the best deals in its price range, so I bought one a couple months ago. I've been more than happy with it so far. The receiver is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00331.html (8,605 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Re: ts-850 (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Fri Aug 30 18:38:37 2002; _________________________________________________________ IMO, the TS-870 has an even better receiver. On my '850, a very strong station (40 over 9) very close in frequency could be heard weakly - le; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00332.html (7,701 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]