Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\s+\"No\s+QSL\s+Needed\"\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed" (score: 1)
Author: jsschuster@snet.net (jsschuster@snet.net)
Date: Thu Oct 10 20:23:46 2002
I like the Q Signal "QNQ" "Please do not QSL!" JACK -- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00090.html (7,500 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed" (score: 1)
Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John Laney)
Date: Fri Oct 11 09:52:50 2002
Re: Proposed Q signal QNQ for please do not QSL. Please try to pick another signal since QNQ already has a very well known and defined meaning used daily on CW traffic nets. Also, it would be helpful
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00099.html (7,553 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed" (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Fri Oct 11 11:33:22 2002
How about QDQ "Don't QSL"? Zack W9SZ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00102.html (7,843 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed" (score: 1)
Author: je1cka@jzap.com (Tack Kumagai)
Date: Tue Oct 15 15:14:09 2002
I write QDQ just below the signature of Summary for "Don't disQulify me,PLEASE" -- Tack Kumagai JE1CKA/KH0AM Internet: je1cka@jzap.com NEW URL! http://je1cka.jzap.com/ Mike Urich, KA5CVH www.ka5cvh.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00123.html (8,257 bytes)

5. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed" (score: 1)
Author: radio@stelex.com.au (Mike, VK4DX)
Date: Wed Oct 16 21:18:33 2002
There's a Russian station UA3QSY (or RA3QSY, not sure about his prefix) Imagine a DX station working split on CW and this guy not realizing it's a split thing actually transmits on DX's frequency. H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00128.html (8,635 bytes)

6. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed" (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich, KA5CVH)
Date: Tue Oct 15 08:41:31 2002
Mike Urich, KA5CVH www.ka5cvh.com LaPorte TX EL-29 Amateur Radio *IS* a contact sport!
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00319.html (7,460 bytes)

7. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed" (score: 1)
Author: ua3vcs@mail.ru (Art Popoff)
Date: Wed Oct 16 07:47:42 2002
Hi to All, NOQSL sounds a bit too wide. If I QRV from some remote QTH and am of some interest to amateur radio community people, sending NOQSL means WHAT?.. No qsl from who.. HIM or ME? In this regar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00320.html (7,739 bytes)

8. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed" (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich, KA5CVH)
Date: Wed Oct 16 07:27:03 2002
That's actually N0QSL (N-Zero-QSL) and was tongue in cheek since as club meetings etc we refer to people who are working on their licesnse of having the license N0CAL or N0KAL <No-Call> Mike Urich, K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00322.html (7,691 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu