Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\s+\:\s+10M\s+Multi\s+Operator\s+Category\s+\-\s+A\s+change\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\s+\:\s+10M\s+Multi\s+Operator\s+Category\s+\-\s+A\s+change\?\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re : 10M Multi Operator Category - A change? (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:43:33 -0500; All of the serious mult-ops have at least one, sometimes 2, receiving stations hunting for mults while they run anyway. The issue is in coordinating working the found mults, not in operating multiple; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00125.html (7,441 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]