Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\s+\:\s+Log\s+Analysis\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\s+\:\s+Log\s+Analysis\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re : Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:28:50 +0000 (GMT); Thanks Doug and others. I did not say that this was illegal, perhaps my post implied it as I had a couple of offlist mails which assured me that there would be only one transmitted signal at any giv; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00363.html (8,452 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re : Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:13:48 -0400; If there's a problem here, I don't think it's a 2nd or "mult" station problem. Unlike all other categories, there's no explicit "one signal at any one time" or "one signal per band" rule for M/S in C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00378.html (7,642 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re : Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: "Neil Powell" <neilpowell1@eircom.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:35:57 +0100; Brian, I personally think as a regular participate in M/S category that it has got out of hand with many stations that I personally think should at a minimum be in M/2 or even M/M taking part with al; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00383.html (10,162 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re : Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:19:49 -0400; Nothing - That sounds legal to me. But you could do nearly the same thing if you have the cluster or skimmer. With your two stations watch all the bands on the cluster that the running station is not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00384.html (9,098 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]