Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Real\s+emergencies\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan W5KFT" <w5kft@nts-online.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:41:57 -0600
A couple of years ago when 10 meters was really rocking, I had a really interesting situation come up in the ARRL 10 meter contest. The station came back on and said, "I don't have a call, I am not a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00450.html (10,716 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:50:25 -0500
Bryan Jim W0UO/5 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00466.html (10,357 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:12:20 -0000
Speaking of things like that... would it not be a good idea for the arrl to advice their emergency coordinators, races, or ares people of contest stations that may be useful to contact for emergency
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00473.html (12,713 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:29:50 -0500
Back in 1977, during SS a local dam burst, flooding a valley below the dam, causing 39 fatalities. http://ga.water.usgs.gov/news/historical-toccoa/ I was a fairly active traffic handler at the time,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00474.html (10,213 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:36:38 -0000
NO NO NO While what W5KFT did was, maybe, morally correct what he did was very, very, illegal. The citation would probably be several pages long. 1. He knowingly communicated with an unlicensed stati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00475.html (12,256 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "SJ W3TX" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:50:03 -0500
I had a similar situation in a contest about 25 years ago. A ham in SA had emergency traffic to pass to the family of a missionary whom was in their village and having some problems. I was picked by
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00481.html (9,999 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "SJ W3TX" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:07:20 -0500
It is truly sad that someone would be less concerned about saving a life than following an arcane rule. W5KFT did the right thing! My best regards, Scott W3TX ________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00483.html (8,710 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "Steve.Root@culligan.com" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:19:07 +0100
Still a tough call. Would you risk losing your license to save somebody's life? In a stituation like a traffic accident minutes mean everything and there probably isn't time to go through proper chan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00484.html (14,551 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:11:18 -0600
Mal, I hope you aren't being serious. No regulator is going to propose that between the alternatives of someone's death or a brief, otherwise illegal communication, a person must instead die. If self
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00486.html (15,226 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:32:51 -0600
What Bryan reported that he did was right - period. Someone contacted him and stated it was an emergency. The FCC Rules Say: "&sect; 97.403 Safety of life and protection of property. No provision of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00487.html (13,949 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:59:59 -0500
authorities it is not up to an individual amateur radio operator to decide, on his own, that something is an emergency and begin non-amateur communications Last time I read the rules, anyone is allo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00488.html (10,177 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "Steve.Root@culligan.com" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:21:36 +0100
K0SR didn't write that, N7MAL did. I was arguing against that viewpoint. 73 Steve K0SR -- Original Message -- decide, somebody's and _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00489.html (10,477 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: Adam S Hoffman <wy4n@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:05:03 -0500
N7MAL KFT and NN are HELPING people not COMPLAINING about rules and regs, what have you done lately for anyone? From reading the emails on this list, you apparently sit around finding fault in everyt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00494.html (14,923 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: asciibaron@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:11:45 +0000
re-read Part 97, specifically 97.405 . http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/ -steve KB3KAQ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00497.html (9,454 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:08:46 -0600 (CST)
First thing Mal, I did not "hammer" you either publicly, or privately. I specifically decided to "take the high road" with my comment, and not point out how incredibly *wrong* you are with this from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00498.html (12,469 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:11:24 -0500
That allows an amateur to use any means of communications "when normal means of communications are not available." However, it does not permit an amateur to intentionally ignore (fail to own and/or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00499.html (9,599 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:51:32 -0000
I have been hammered pretty well both publicly and privately by a great number of 'jail-house' lawyers. I would like to suggest, in the most positive manner, when you attempt to quote a rule, to make
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00500.html (11,384 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:34:02 -0600 (CST)
Joe, You need to re-think that one. "However, it does not permit an amateur to intentionally ignore (fail to own and/or deploy) normal commercial communications services. " Say what? Where do you see
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00502.html (11,352 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:34:16 -0800
Arguments over the minutia of part 97 aside, you also have to consider the realities of enforcement. Even if what W5KFT did was actually illegal, I seriously doubt that the FCC would have revoked W5K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00503.html (11,117 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:42:54 -0000
&sect;97.405 Station in distress. (a) No provision of these rules prevents the use by an amateur station in distress of any means at its disposal to attract attention, make known its condition and lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00505.html (11,097 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu