Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Reality\s+check\s+for\s+contesters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Reality check for contesters (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed Mar 21 10:45:33 2001
I am of the opinion that many who participate in this great reflector do so because they like to write not contest! If you're serious about amateur radio, how can you not support the ARRL? If you're
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00287.html (7,303 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Reality check for contesters (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@berkshire.net (David Robbins)
Date: Fri Mar 23 16:07:13 2001
my question is, if you are serious enough to get on packet, or to set up and run a packet node, why don't you support action to help protect our spectrum. i have been trying to drum up support on the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00295.html (9,880 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Reality check for contesters (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@akorn.net (Ed)
Date: Sun Mar 25 15:40:34 2001
David Robbins wrote: I have selected this particular invader because they are obvious intruders, relatively easy to get rough locations just from what they talk about, and very persistant. See my web
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00306.html (7,508 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu