Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Rebutal\s+to\s+Scourges\s+of\s+Contesting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Rebutal\s+to\s+Scourges\s+of\s+Contesting\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Rebutal to Scourges of Contesting (score: 1): Author: tombaugh@discoverynet.com (tombaugh); Date: Wed Jun 11 09:32:48 2003; All of these gripes fall into the same category of disapproval. Contester A is unhappy with the rules as they are for one reaosn or another. In an apparent effort to try to sway the contest sponsors; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00155.html (8,725 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Rebutal to Scourges of Contesting (score: 1): Author: kr7x@attbi.com (kr7x@attbi.com); Date: Wed Jun 11 19:04:46 2003; Tom: Thank you for you comments. I agree whole heartedly. Having had the opportunity on several occasions to operate at big gun DX stations, I confirm your view. The use of packet or other spotting m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00157.html (11,500 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Rebutal to Scourges of Contesting (score: 1): Author: w7ti@ispwest.com (Bill Turner); Date: Wed Jun 11 12:06:08 2003; _________________________________________________________ That's your answer? Don't play the game? No complaints, no suggestions for a better contest? Just shut up and either play or don't? No, thank; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00158.html (7,138 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Rebutal to Scourges of Contesting (score: 1): Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker); Date: Wed Jun 11 14:20:19 2003; CQ-Contest is _the_ national forum for discussing and debating issues related to radio contesting, including contest rules. This is the appropriate forum for persuasive debate on these topics. It sou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00159.html (11,067 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]