Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Receiver\s+specs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Receiver\s+specs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Receiver specs (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Fri Mar 10 17:14:18 2000; I have been following the thread about receiver specs with great interest. I am disappointed that my particular radio: IC-746 was not included in the comparison. The spec sheet talks about a 99db dyn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00134.html (8,053 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Receiver specs (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (John Battin); Date: Fri Mar 10 19:49:41 2000; I recently measured my 746 and it looked very good under single signal interference conditions but marginal under two signal intermodulation conditions. It is way better than the DSP rigs I have look; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00137.html (6,912 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Receiver specs (score: 1): Author: W4EF@pacbell.net (Michael Tope); Date: Sat Mar 11 11:29:27 2000; Hi Ford, If the "splatter" in question is generated in the offending stations transmitter, then the only thing you can do is turn your antenna away from him since the interference actually falls onto; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00151.html (9,030 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Receiver specs (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Mon Mar 13 15:00:32 2000; [ snip ] Yes. The simpliest way to see if a "splattering" signal is likely coming from the transmitter, or is being generated in the front-end of your reciever is to put in 20 dB of receiver attenuat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00182.html (7,562 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]