Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Reciever\s+Protectorr\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Reciever\s+Protectorr\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Reciever Protectorr (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 12:00:57 -0500; A unit like this. https://www.dxengineering.com/search/product-line/dx-engineering-receiver-guard-electronic-rf-limiters?autoview=SKU&keyword=receive%20protector&sortby=BestKeywordMatch&sortorder=Asc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00087.html (7,672 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reciever Protectorr (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:34:43 -0500; I'm thinking for Field Day. We have the Passband filters for out of band strong stuff. But they don't help protect front ends from in band sigs like Phone station CW station Digital station all on t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00090.html (9,188 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reciever Protectorr (score: 1): Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:13:53 -0400; Joe, I use one going into the RCV antenna port of my FT1000MPs. I often use beverages with dual radio same band (160 - 40) and this type of product insures no blown receiver front end. 73 Ed N1UR A u; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00091.html (8,632 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reciever Protectorr (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:45:05 -0400; Hello Joe If your radio does not have the ability to break out the RX antenna - you can use the DXE RTR-2. With the RG5000 plug in module, it will protect your receiver front end. https://www.dxengin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00093.html (9,905 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reciever Protectorr (score: 1): Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:42:10 -0400; Joe, The Passband filters are really for close in overload rejection of radios on different bands. They don't protect in the technical sense. If the spacing of the stations is at least 150 ft and you; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00094.html (10,528 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reciever Protectorr (score: 1): Author: Juan Hidalgo EA8RM <ea8cac@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:55:03 +0100; Hello Joe: Take a look to this. EA4TX products are really good. https://ea4tx.com/en/tienda/frontend-limiter/trx-fel/ -- 73s de EA8RM -- <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_sourc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00099.html (10,771 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reciever Protectorr (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:57:33 -0500; Very interesting! Have to convert the price next. But one bit of specifications that was missing was performance. Has losses and SWR's but it does not specify at what level does it start to block s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00101.html (12,454 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]