Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Recording\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Recording (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Mon Jul 21 21:42:06 2003
One fellow asked why recording a contest is so bad. I'm not sure it's "so bad," but I have a few reasons to dislike the practice. I don't mean to disparage anybody, but... To me, contesting is to Ama
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00219.html (9,043 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Recording (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Mon Jul 21 23:08:54 2003
Kelly, I think taping a contest is perfectly fine as long as one doesn't replay the tape until after the log is turned in. Although I have never done it, I think it would be interesting to go back an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00224.html (7,997 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Recording (score: 1)
Author: esa.korhonen@picengineering.com (Esa Korhonen)
Date: Tue Jul 22 11:21:56 2003
Fellow contesters, I agree with Kelly, but I'd like to remind that the practice of recording a contest can benefit you also other ways than going back and massage the log. I often like to put on the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00225.html (10,633 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Recording (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Tue Jul 22 07:42:21 2003
"Tape recording a contest for posterity is one thing: taping a contest with the intent of going back to fix missed calls to gain an advantage strikes me as wanting to go back on Monday and re-play th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00227.html (7,139 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Recording (score: 1)
Author: contesting@eircom.net (Tim Makins, EI8IC)
Date: Tue Jul 22 19:52:50 2003
There have been quite a few comments on the merits of recording, but I don't think anyone answered the original question - the mechanics of computer recording of a contest - except one person, who sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00236.html (7,075 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Recording (score: 1)
Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen)
Date: Tue Jul 22 21:01:55 2003
You can take a look at http://www.sagebrush.com/recpro.htm Recorded a contest or two and it works great. Should probably do it more to check against my UBN's to see where I messed up. 73, Ron WD4AHZ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00239.html (7,302 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Recording (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue Jul 22 22:26:21 2003
I use software called RecAll Pro by Sagebrush software, which records in a variety of compressions and time-stamps the recording so you can go readily to the right place to check a bust. a 48-hour re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00242.html (7,672 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] recording (score: 1)
Author: lu2brg@cvtci.com.ar (Ernesto Grueneberg)
Date: Thu Dec 4 17:15:53 1997
hello! I need advise about audio file formats. I will try to record a full contest, and then transfer it to a CD. Using wav 5500hz, 8 bits, mono, 48 hs are about 900 mb, and a cd only supports 640. d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00090.html (6,387 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] recording (score: 1)
Author: Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou@voyackey.net>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 10:43:22 +0900 (JST)
For those who are worrying about long time recording with your PC, try IC recorder. I've recorded most of my contest operations for years including WRTC 2014. Olympus provides suitable recorders. For
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00498.html (7,251 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] recording (score: 1)
Author: "XV4Y (Yan)" <xv4y@nature-mekong.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 07:28:49 +0700
Hi, It's a very interesting piece of software. I will try to run it. If it can run on 2008 Dell Mini 9 (single core Atom) along with N1MM, then it can run on any computer. HP offers its Stream 11 for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00529.html (8,700 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu