Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:33:50 -0500; VIII. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS: 1. Operating location: All transmitters and receivers used by the entrant must be located within a single 500-meter diameter circle. Antennas must be physically connected; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00176.html (8,221 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:05:45 -0400 (EDT); I would think the rich guy presently has the advantage of being able to afford to rent, physically travel to, and physically occupy a remote contest location. (Plus perhaps having the additional leis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00182.html (8,148 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:44:06 -0500; Nothing has been said which persuades me that it is "bad" for the operator to be remote from the station, whether the station is across town, across the state, across the continent, or across an ocea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00185.html (8,848 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:49:04 -0500; Why is this such a bitter pill for some people to swallow? The station is in one location and that is the location that counts, That is where the RF comes from and goes to. When you add the hardware; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00211.html (10,744 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:21:37 +0100; Why is this such a bitter pill for some people to swallow? The station is in one location and that is the location that counts, That is where the RF comes from and goes to. When you add the hardware; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00220.html (8,580 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: N1MM <tfwagner@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:10:14 -0400; The opponents don't want some well-heeled guy buying an oceanfront lot, building a big contest station and beating the locals. People don't like carpetbaggers. That's about it. 73, Tom - N1MM On 6/18; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00223.html (11,078 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:42:49 +0200; How comes that stations with remote transmit sites like Norddeich Radio were licensed for the transmitter location and not for the operating location? All audio went over land lines which is comparab; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00229.html (8,549 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:19:09 -0600; Because the rf radiates from the tx site. And that, is what the governing agencies are interested in. Just because the mic is located... over that-a way... and the tx is way over this-a-way... doesn'; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00235.html (9,641 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:49:50 +0200; Interesting information, I never knew that. I understand that such technologies find their way in practical daily situations. Do not see what Norddeich Radio has to do with HamRadio Contesting. In my; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00237.html (9,629 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:59:36 +0200; Sorry Tom, But 'the opponents' are not amused by being accused of being jealous or anything like that. Again, for the record; I very much respect all the work and effort done for enabling a remote HF; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00239.html (9,101 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:13:40 +0200; Mark, I fully agree, ham radio communication is RF to RF, point to point or multi point. I do not even consider FM repeaters as true ham radio. But that has nothing to do with the way one connects hi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00241.html (10,892 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:03:38 -0600; So where your butt sits determines if it is ham radio? I really don't understand those that want to limit the participation in contests. Are we not better off with more people contesting than less? I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00242.html (10,511 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:11:58 -0500; I cannot help but ask: why? What difference does it make to you whether the guy is operating remote or in front of the radio? He clearly has to deal with network latency and other issues as well as i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00245.html (10,013 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:12:29 -0400; Paul EI5DI wrote: . . . . . The bottom line is they're different, very different. I agree Paul So Paul, lets take this a step further: the technology exists today to place a station capable of remote; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00246.html (9,848 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:02:53 -0500; Some interesting comments here by W2LC: So what? Your RF is going from your station all the way to wherever the other station is located - what difference does it make where the person is - who is op; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00249.html (10,549 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:56:41 +0100; Jim W2LC has raised a number of valid issues that would be better dealt with by the Contests Advisory Committee and the DXCC Advisory Committee. Some of the issues are complex, and will require the i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00250.html (10,960 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "Milt -- N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:40:01 -0700; Mike, It is impossible to reason with anyone who does not have a semblance of common sense. They are so wrapped up in their tiny ball of me, myself and I, that they are incapable of looking at the wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00251.html (13,198 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:53:32 -0600; Will someone.. explain to me.. please? How it is that with a remote station.. the rf starts at your home station, gets transferred to the remote station... via rf.. then retransmitted again.. as rf..; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00253.html (14,226 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:40:16 -0400; "Is there a rule for not working yourself?" At one time I believe at least some contests had a rule precluding an operator from using multiple calls during the contest. I am not sure that rule exists; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00257.html (12,987 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:53:59 -0400; I'd be careful with that analogy. Broadcast radio/TV has the concept of "community of license", which may be different than the licensed transmitter and backup transmitter locations, and is alien to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00258.html (8,767 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]