Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s+Control\s+in\s+Contests\s*$/: 101 ]

Total 101 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:56:23 -0300 (BRT)
Bob, Pete et Al I am myself a remote operator. I don't have any problem with that, it keeps me active in the hobby I love.  My station is about 150 km from my apartment in Rio. I think the reason for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00120.html (14,075 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:44:34 -0800
My mike cord is 4 ft long, The CAT cable is maybe 5 ft. Does this make all my contacts bad? I remote control with a computer. Rex K7QQ ____________________________________________________________ Get
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00121.html (14,958 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:33:40 -0600
You misunderstand. The operator of the remote station cannot count contacts made from the remote station if the remote station is located in a different country. If I created a station on KP2 I could
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00122.html (12,575 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:45:22 +0000
Interesting perspective Ron. So the next thing will be to have a group of top notch operators sitting at home, operating their favourite band at a multi/multi remote contest station on the other side
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00123.html (10,103 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:19:18 -0400
Bob, I don't have any idea what creative bit of mischief ARRL was trying to head off with that rule. The previous one, Rule 8, clearly harks back to cases where people claimed to be operating from sh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00124.html (14,880 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Mackanos - K2DB" <k2db@k2db.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:32:22 -0400
How do you know if a station is remote? Here is a case in point: This is Paul, K2DB and I do run a remote station. If I am in a contest, and I work you, how do you know if I am remote or not? How do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00125.html (9,238 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:24:23 -0800
The contest in question (CQ WPX) has the following rules governing remote operation. IV. Terms of Competition for All Categories: (f) All operation must take place from one operating site. Transmitte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00126.html (13,505 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:55:37 -0600
Explain what is wrong with a remote multi multi. How would this affect you our your pleasure in any way shape or form? You would not even know. Why do you care where the operator is physically locate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00127.html (11,510 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:11:19 -0700
Thank you. I strive for excellence. No that's not why it's called remote control. It is called remote control because the control operator is not co-located with the radio(s). Prior to the internet (
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00128.html (13,091 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
The IOTA Contest is one contest out of hundreds, and the RSGB is one organizer out of dozens.  They can run their contest their way and the rest of 'em will run theirs how they like.  Or are you sayi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00129.html (12,462 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:55:10 -0500
HEAR HEAR! _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00130.html (10,173 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:39:38 -0400
Well, that's the rub, isn't it? Understand before I say anything else that recognizing the issue(s) and potential pitfall(s) does not imply that either do or do not endorse this mode of operating or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00131.html (13,294 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:13:57 -0700
How is that?? How is having a good internet connection Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00132.html (9,161 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:53:32 +0000 (GMT)
Thanks for 'clarification' I ain't no legal beagel, but I can see some problems with rules: Sooo, is that really ALL operation? Operator, his operating tools (RX, TX, ant, computer, logging, mike, ke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00133.html (14,695 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Ken McCormack <zl1aih@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:19:45 +1200
Hi Randy, IV. Terms of Competition for All Categories: (f) states "*All operation must take place from one operating site."* (my emphasis) "All operation" must surely include the operator/s, or am I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00134.html (12,128 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:09:31 -0600
In the year 2025 Everyone will be at the top of the DXCC Honour Role Cause all countries/entities will have remote links with a radio and antennas assisted by skimmers In the year 2035 You won't need
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00135.html (12,722 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:01:03 -0600
Actually what you wrote could easily be today. One of the weak signal programs had the automated QSO portion of the program removed because the author just didn't feel right about it, but the technol
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00136.html (13,982 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:01:37 -0700
Clearly stated, the STATION licensee. 73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a boy and his radio" -- Sea stories at --> http://k0hb.wordpress.com Superstition trails --> http://oldslowhans.wordpress.com ___________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00139.html (10,666 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:06:57 -0700
Sounds like a good deal to me. Saves on travel costs. I don't see any downside. 73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a boy and his radio" -- Sea stories at --> http://k0hb.wordpress.com Superstition trails --> ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00140.html (9,333 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Michael D. Adams" <mda@ab1od.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:40:56 -0400
I'm still a relative newcomer, so take these thoughts with an appropriate dose of salt. I think the reason that it makes sense for remote operation to be considered "cheating" in IOTA, but not in CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00143.html (15,150 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu