I thought I would summarize some of my questions in one post. How does someone operating remotely affect your effort? How does someone operating remotely become unfair to you? Why does it matter how
That's generous of Mike, but I started the Remote Control thread and I believe he will find direct answers to many of his questions in my original post. http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/cq-conte
** You answered your own question ... the station is in a different country. Traditionally the operator was in the same country as was the station. ** Those two thoughts are completely unrelated and
You cite "traditionally" as a reason to refute Mike's assertion. Didn't we traditionally use paper logs too? Seriously, where do you draw the line of demarcation to what is embraced as a new developm
Like the VE5 VY0 situation, dont agree with that ... Maybe u have remote in VY0 ?? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.conte
Doug, I am not trying to justify anything. I am trying to get a better feel for why people are adverse to this from a contesting and activity standpoint. Why does the location of the operator bother
For contests I care less. It obviously is a combination of operator and station, and the fact there is Internet between the two doesn't matter. For DXCC and other things, I think the rules are messe
Given all the very significant technological changes and rule modifications that have occurred over the several past decades to make DXing and contesting easier and more accessible, "tradition" has t
To put some more powder into the flame, Russian DX contest is another one that explicitly prohibits remote operation. 5.1.2 Using any IP net for the remote transceiving, including web radio stations
As others have mentioned previously, the suspicion is that RDXC was trying to prohibit the use of clandestine remote stations. For example, I live in Arizona but if I want an illegal competitive adva