Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Res\:\s+Petition\s+to\s+Ban\s+Skimmer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Res\:\s+Petition\s+to\s+Ban\s+Skimmer\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Res: Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1): Author: "Renner, PY7RP" <py7rp@yahoo.com.br>; Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 08:51:32 -0700 (PDT); Hi Guys, I agree with Pete, Why ban the technology? That is a stupid petition. Somebody could think even that people working with DSP would be in advantage to others who doenst. As the example above,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00111.html (9,526 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Res: Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 14:43:32 -0500; I am amazed at the callsigns I'm seeing on this petition to BAN technology! It leads me to believe there is unprecedented cheating going on in this petition process. If these petitioners REALLY belie; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00123.html (12,481 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Res: Petition to Ban Skimmer (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 11:44:02 +0000; I think the idea here is to ban Skimmer ** in a contest **, not ban it in general. People still use motors on the backs of their boats, they just can't use them in the America's Cup. People use alumi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00145.html (12,872 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]