Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Response\s+to\s+KA1LMR\'s\s+Posting\s+About\s+Spotting\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:12:32 EST
In a message dated 3/10/06 4:12:23 AM Greenwich Standard Time, ka1lmr@yahoo.com writes: PS: I notice alot of stations ask the statsions they work to spot them over and over I guess that really ought
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00117.html (9,652 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <W5OV@W5OV.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:50:59 -0600
K4XS said: "Yes, lots of stations ask me and others to spot them. Most experienced contesters agree that those actions put them in the assisted class or higher. I have no problem with stations asking
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00120.html (8,643 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:27:19 -0500
K4XS: packet, running illegal power or some other thing, his accomplishments are always tarnished by that, "I wonder if he cheated in that one too ?". Very true Bill. One thing I've learned in life i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00121.html (7,788 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:59:08 -0000
Hello all, It was written "I notice alot of stations ask the statsions they work to spot them...." I like to make clear that in the above scenario the station asking to be spotted should be immediate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00125.html (9,548 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:38:35 -0800
Actually, no. Asking another station to spot you is prohibited to all contest stations in ARRL contests. See the discussion at: (http://www.arrl.org/contests/hf-faq.html#spotting) Doing so should res
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00126.html (9,425 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:09:56 -0500
Ok, guys, I'd like to suggest something here. I'm an old fart, and many of you are too, but this guy's NOT. He's a YOUNGSTER. I'm sure he's gotten the point. Now let's do this: MOVE ON! We're going t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00128.html (8,556 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:11:47 -0000
"3.14. In contests where spotting nets are permissible, spotting your own station or requesting another station to spot you is not permitted." As I read this rules I can clearly see that this rule ap
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00131.html (12,416 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:46:28 -0000
You didn't read far enough: 3.14.In contests where spotting nets are permissible, spotting your own station or requesting another station to spot you is not permitted. Note, not a change in class...
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00135.html (12,215 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <W5OV@W5OV.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:31:05 -0600
Jose, Perhaps something is lost in the translation from English to Spanish. You cited: "3.14. In contests where spotting nets are permissible, spotting your own station or requesting another station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00138.html (14,996 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: n6zo@aol.com
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:39:29 -0500
Disagree! this is flagrant cheating He was using phony call signs and hoping NOT TO GET CAUGHT. He knew the rules, no doubt he knew the consequences. new blood like this we don't need. I don't recomm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00139.html (9,563 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:34:43 -0800
Amen Bill Self spot--no no. Against rules! No do! From socialist W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00145.html (8,431 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu