Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Reverse\s+Beacon\"\s+Test\s+using\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Reverse\s+Beacon\"\s+Test\s+using\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon" Test using CW Skimmer (score: 1): Author: "José Nunes CT1BOH" <ct1boh@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:19:36 +0000; "hears" you, Pete This is a fantastic idea. I thing that I really dislike, is to see a particular station spotted 200 times during a Contest and another competitor just spotted 100 times. It is most; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00085.html (7,965 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon" Test using CW Skimmer (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:44:50 -0700; And the really nice thing about a skimmer-based packet system is that it will encourage stations to CQ and sign their call much more frequently, otherwise skimmer won't find them. Skimmer needs to be; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00086.html (8,016 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon" Test using CW Skimmer (score: 1): Author: Prasad <vu2ptt@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 00:35:48 +0530; I'll have a Skimmer running here so all of you can test the long hops of your antennas. And if we can find a way of feeding in the S-meter reading into the Skimmer spot, you will not need me here to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00087.html (9,452 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]