Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Revised\s+2011\s+NAQP\s+Rules\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: "S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:22:22 -0800
EI5DI proposes: 1) Single Operator SO 2) Single Operator Hybrid SOH (uses other comms technologies or multi-channel decoders) We got local definiton for the first category: Brontosaurus on the Stone
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00096.html (8,525 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:09:25 -0700
The VA considers me practically deaf -- up to 90db loss (do the math) in each ear. Phone contesting is extremely difficult (you should see my UBN reports for phone weekends), but Morse is far easier
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00098.html (12,546 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 05:50:51 -0800 (PST)
While you guys are busy trying to save ham radio contesting by finding the perfect word to substitute for assisted I hope you won't lose sight of the fact that the contest is this weekend! I'd hate t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00101.html (12,138 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:09:25 EST
Hi Ken, Why flip a coin? Do both! Maybe flip a coin to decide which to start in, but do get some NAQP CW time in before 0600z. As in any contest, the more the merrier. NAQP is big, but still small en
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00104.html (9,128 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 11:32:01 -0800 (PST)
I sure hope it was a gold coin you flipped! ;o) Julius Fazekas N2WN Tennessee Contest Group http://k4tcg.org/ http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en Tennessee QSO Party http://www.tnqp.org/ Elecra
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00105.html (12,980 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:02:05 -0800
I think this is exactly on the right track. Here's some comments and fodder... IMHO: 1) An operator is a human being. Single-operator entrants involve exactly one human during the contest period. All
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00121.html (13,704 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 12:26:11 -0800
I received several private email comments on the ideas I tossed out, so I'll answer my own message to elaborate... The word "contest" implies competition. Most of us would like to compete, but want t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00124.html (19,483 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu