Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Revised\s+2011\s+NAQP\s+Rules\s+\-\s+while\s+we\'re\s+at\s+it\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:38:01 -0500
Good choice. While we're at it, how about adding Washington, D.C. as a multiplier? ARRL DX, ARRL 10, CQ 160, and others all do it. Plus, its not as if there is no activity from DC. Indeed, there were
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00365.html (9,055 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:04:46 -0800
And make Campbell, CA a mult also. I'd really like to be on the "chased" side of things for a change... Jack Brindle, W6FB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00370.html (10,195 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:42:44 -0600
The mults for the naqp are states. I don't think Campbell, CA is a separate state from CA. -- George Fremin III _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00372.html (8,773 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:16:31 -0600
Yesterday while at Barnes & Noble, I sat down to browse through an interesting book about the formation of state boundaries as the USA grew from east to west. There were interesting tales about the s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00374.html (10,830 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: w7dra@juno.com
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 21:54:14 -0800
I don't know...there are a lot of people up here who think Renton is not a part of Washington...............we could have 546 multipliers before you could say, "Quit fooling around!!" mike w7dra ____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00379.html (7,151 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:30:34 -0800
That is kind of the point. Washington, DC is not a state either. Let's leave well enough alone. Jack Brindle, W6FB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00392.html (10,303 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:36:10 EST
In contests that distinguish between Canada's Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut, it makes as much or more sense to recognize the District of Columbia as being separate from Maryland. As scare
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00397.html (8,538 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:36:55 -0500
No, its not a state, but as I mentioned before, several contests recognize the District as a distinct entity - worthy of a multiplier. ARRL DX, CQ 160, ARRL 10, etc., all list DC as a multiplier. So,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00398.html (11,824 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 07:20:37 -0700
Let's take it a step further - any contests that break up YU, NU, adnNWT into separate mutls should also include Mexcian states as mults. Then next, does Belize have states? :.) Barry W2UP __________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00404.html (9,566 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 10:16:10 -0800 (PST)
That's the most logical thing I've read here in a while... Live long and Prosper. 73 es HNY, Julius Julius Fazekas N2WN Tennessee Contest Group http://k4tcg.org/ http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00415.html (9,966 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu