- 1. [CQ-Contest] Robots (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Cassel" <doncassel@rogers.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:45:11 -0400
- Tree, Not disagreeing with your comments on Cabrillo robots and I too appreciate the volunteers who make the software work. For myself, it seems that when a problem is repetitive year after year then
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00192.html (8,037 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Robots (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:22:47 -0400
- "Don Cassel" <doncassel@rogers.com> wrote: "Not disagreeing with your comments on Cabrillo robots and I too appreciate the volunteers who make the software work. Finally, contest logging software dev
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00194.html (7,993 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Robots (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:13:59 +0000
- My experience has been different. If there's a problem with my Cabrillo log, the Robot returns an e-mail that spells out the problem and allows me to make corrections on the spot. The second attempt
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00197.html (9,444 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Robots (score: 1)
- Author: "Nat Heatwole" <nat@ajheatwole.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:54:39 -0400
- Don, I'm curious, what do you mean by "most" and "relatively few"? At least among the major contests (things like CQ WW, ARRL DX, WPX), contests which presumably Cabrillo was originally intended for
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00200.html (8,391 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Robots (score: 1)
- Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:51:55 -0400
- Shelby Summerville is right on. In trying to check the CQ 160 Contest I have found 42 CW and 23 SSB logs that are OK in the summary but have improper info in the QSO line. This messes up my NIL progr
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00201.html (9,060 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu