Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SIGNING\s+CALLS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SIGNING\s+CALLS\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: rfpwr@linknet.net (rfpwr@linknet.net); Date: Wed Jul 22 09:38:37 1998; I agree with Dick, N6AA that there are times, under some conditions, where one might not send your callsign after every exchange. This would depend on the operator and the nature of the pileup. I kno; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00186.html (8,423 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: k4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Wed Jul 22 23:11:31 1998; As the unnamed partner of W4AN at WRTC, I agree with Bill that we signed our call always and that is the best thing to do most of the time. Dick probably is right also, that there may be very limited; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00187.html (11,024 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike); Date: Thu Jul 23 03:17:37 1998; <SNIP> under some conditions, where one might not send your callsign after every exchange. This would depend on the operator and the nature of the pileup. <END OF SNIP> Well I had a chance to test th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00188.html (8,496 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: g4buo@compuserve.com (Dave Lawley); Date: Thu Jul 23 19:23:16 1998; I agree that on the whole, it is better to sign your call after each QSO. Few would disagree that the strategies suggested by Dick N6AA can help to squeeze a few more Qs, or some more valuable Qs, ou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00192.html (8,434 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: Ve3bmv@aol.com (Ve3bmv@aol.com); Date: Fri Jul 24 14:00:38 1998; Suggestions for those who want to grow up to be good (contest) operators: 1. Sign your own call after each QSO, at least in short format like: "Pee Forty Eh" (no need to say "Portugal Four Zero Ameri; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00199.html (8,474 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Fri Jul 24 22:24:58 1998; have programmed "R 8P9Z" for years. Some prefer just to send the callsign and I may try that this year, but it lends to some confusion for the guy who gets through on the first call and can't figure; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00200.html (9,624 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: wl7e@silverlink.net (Joe); Date: Fri Jul 24 20:05:33 1998; Sorry Yuri, bad suggestion. If I work someone and they don't say "roger" or "thank you" on ssb or cw, they are not in my log. If I work P40A and give him a report and he says "P40A", how do I know h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00201.html (8,664 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: kh2d@kuentos.guam.net (Jim Kehler); Date: Sat Jul 25 05:21:49 1998; Well, Dave, I send TU KH2D - because I want to thank the station I just worked for sitting in the pileup and working me, or for answering my CQ, and it tends to be a better 'terminator' for the QSO,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00205.html (13,522 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: perring@texas.net (Bob Perring); Date: Sat Jul 25 08:39:16 1998; ==> Hello Dave, I think I'll keep right on being polite, even if it might be a little less efficient, and I think I'll keep right on thanking my QSO's with a "TU". It may sound a bit strange to say,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00209.html (8,872 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: Ve3bmv@aol.com (Ve3bmv@aol.com); Date: Sat Jul 25 09:55:17 1998; << If I work P40A and give him a report and he says "P40A", how do I know he got the qso correct? I don't have access to his "ESP" nor would want it. >> If I didn't get it correct, I will ask for fil; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00210.html (9,046 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Sat Jul 25 09:08:43 1998; Convention? It's what we heard the 'big boys' use when we were learning contesting. what we're True, but "73" and "test" are much longer, but people still use it; even the 'big boys'. I catch myself; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00212.html (9,752 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Sat Jul 25 10:27:35 1998; <snip> One thing I have noticed that really seems to get me a few more contacts during the last few hours of a contest is to become as inefficient as I can - I slow the keyer down to 15 or 16 WPM, se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00213.html (8,809 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: wfeidt@cpcug.org (Bill Feidt); Date: Sat Jul 25 10:38:08 1998; As a perennial third tier S&Per, I have to second this sentiment. If only the call sign is sent for acknowledgement, I have no way to distinguish between: 1. "Yes, I QSL your information -- you're in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00214.html (9,438 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: k4oj@ij.net (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Sat Jul 25 22:43:42 1998; ..I could sworn we all changed our F3 message as a function of time into contest, band opening - etc.....I KNOW mine gets longer during the slow times....or is this too obvious? 73, Jim, K4OJ Florida; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00215.html (7,833 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: w3cf@email.msn.com (Douglas Priest); Date: Sat Jul 25 10:49:04 1998; Hello everyone! Been reading the thread for a week now and thought I'd add my 2cents... We have a pre-contest meeting and one of the things that is made plain to all ops is that we all sign after eve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00216.html (10,051 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher, W4AN); Date: Sat Jul 25 11:40:06 1998; As someone who would be sending only the callsign if the rate dictated doing so... 1. If a guy sends only his callsign before you started calling, then you know for sure if he only sends his callsign; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00220.html (9,663 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Sat Jul 25 11:59:31 1998; << True, but "73" and "test" are much longer, but people still use it; even the 'big boys'. >> I have always used "73" as an acknowledgment that someone took the time and trouble to call me. A bit pa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00221.html (8,678 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat Jul 25 12:22:26 1998; I agree! To me, running into friends and compatriots IS the fun of contesting. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Champion Radio Products http://www.championradio.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00222.html (8,120 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: OL5Y@contesting.com (Martin Huml); Date: Sat Jul 25 17:32:26 1998; I's easy to say, when you talk about K6T. It is not so easy, when I use IH9/OL5Y... Martin OK1FUA, OL5Y in the contests OL5Y@contesting.com I signed K6T after each and every QSO during WRTC96. I beli; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00223.html (8,658 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: slazar19@sgi.net (Spencer Lazar); Date: Sat Jul 25 16:14:26 1998; Contesters, It's really the human element which improves the scores over a contesting career. I never want to sound like, look like, or be a contest bot. Most of my operating for the last several yea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00226.html (9,260 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]