Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SKIMMER\s+\=\s+BUMMER\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SKIMMER\s+\=\s+BUMMER\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:01:18 -0700; No matter how one chooses to parse the words, one of the unique, intrinsic, and abject joys of amateur radio, in general, and contesting in particular, is the beauty of our ability to COPY signals an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00395.html (16,471 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:35:23 -0400; Jim, I'm sorry you feel that way but the "copy by ear" train left the station many years ago. Not only is CW decoding integral to Writelog, Amateur radio has not required that skill as an entry requi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00396.html (18,979 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:12:36 +0100; Only for those who think CW is just another data mode. CW operators copy by ear because that's what CW operators do. Anyone who does it any other way is a machine operator, a computer operator, a dat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00412.html (9,260 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:19:13 -0700 (PDT); To the best of my knowledge, even tho' CW readers have been around for years, few, serious or even semi-serious contesters use the technology. For that matter, how many folks in the general ham publi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00413.html (18,144 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: Dave Lawley <dave@g4buo.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:38:36 +0100; No, Joe. Turning it into just another datamode will hasten the demise of CW contesting. Dave G4BUO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00421.html (7,212 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:06:40 -0400; operators do. Anyone who does it any other way is a machine operator, a computer operator, a data operator - describe it how you like, they're not CW operators. We can argue technology forever, but; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00425.html (7,285 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:01:39 -0600; Jim, You have a way of getting to the meat of the issue, and you are so correct in your assessment. The title of this debate should be called 'The rise and fall of cw contesting'. Skimmer is for lazy; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00426.html (10,252 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:28:26 -0500; Already done: http://www.cinahazegh.com/2006/05/30/the-amazing-morse-code-keyboard/ 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00428.html (20,849 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:23:51 +0000; Making it possible to work it like 'just another datamode' will allow the new generation of licensees who didn't have to pass a cw test to operate cw and keep cw contesting alive longer. Maybe even; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00434.html (8,210 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 06:22:17 -0700 (PDT); I don't know that anyone is proposing a complete or even partial ban on the technology. It definitely has benefits, as does any code reading technology, particularly getting non-CW folks started on C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00438.html (9,459 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:04:27 -0400; My experience in discussions with young people has been the opposite of the "CW decoding will keep CW alive longer" position. CW is about the worst data mode imaginable. PSK31 is waaaaaay better as a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00444.html (7,364 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:31:43 -0400; N1UR: waaaaaay better as a digital mode in weak signal capability. What data do you have to support that? The two toughest tests I know of for weak signal capabilities are 160m and EME, and I don't s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00448.html (8,550 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:03:27 -0700; And just maybe the sun will rise in the west one day too. Oh sure, those of us who have benefited from the greater than normal pileups that packet - and I soon suppose skimmers - bring to our lonely; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00471.html (10,103 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:50:40 -0400; I'd recognize any of the calls I've held - and entered contests with over the last 30 years - including AD8I, W8IK, K4IK and W4TV at 50 WPM. However, I would certainly not be foolish enough to respo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00473.html (12,657 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:51:26 -0400; n6tj@sbcglobal.net wrote: "If I respond to W4TV's call @ 50 wpm, should Joe ever decide to participate in a contest that is," Jim, please, please make sure that you allow the "masses" to know that th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00483.html (8,070 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:05:03 +0100 (BST); There is some very convoluted logic going on around here. Reminds me of when my daughter asked for help on her class on Classical Logic, fondly imagining that it was remotely logical... Skimmer certa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00484.html (8,124 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:24:24 -0500; Small point of clarification. SCP only contains callsigns (that may or may not be on the air). It DOES NOT contain any exchange information. That said, there are people who maintain and/or use databa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00501.html (9,393 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER (score: 1): Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:05:06 +0100 (BST); "SCP only contains callsigns (that may or may not be on the air). It DOES NOT contain any exchange information." Well, sort of: The callsign is far and away the most important part of the exchange in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00542.html (7,882 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]