Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2Q\s+in\s+WPX\s+Anyone\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2Q\s+in\s+WPX\s+Anyone\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SO2Q in WPX Anyone? (score: 1): Author: Rick Tavan <rick@tavan.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 22:20:23 -0800; In NAQP CW recently, I did something I'd been itching to try for a long time - SO2Q = "Single Op, 2 QTHs." With Rig 1 operating locally and Rig 2 remote from another QTH about 150 miles away, it work; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-01/msg00065.html (8,383 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2Q in WPX Anyone? (score: 1): Author: "ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:34:25 -0400 (AST); Rick, While I certainly do admire your enthusiasm and creativity, seeing no replies (online, not email) to your question I felt I would comment from the "average guy" perspective. This is a very cool; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-01/msg00068.html (10,093 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2Q in WPX Anyone? (score: 1): Author: Rick Tavan <rick@tavan.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:52:17 -0800; Thanks, Mike. Most responses were, as requested, directed to me, not to the reflector. I'm still collecting and will summarize to the reflector. Although it is possible but expensive to build one's o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-01/msg00070.html (11,858 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]