Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+\-\-\s+revised\s+opinion\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+\-\-\s+revised\s+opinion\?\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <W5OV@W5OV.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:14:25 -0600; My questioning is where is the line drawn? I have no problem with SO2R as it is done today - for the most part. Is it ok for a computer to work stations on behalf of the operator and since it's not a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00421.html (9,459 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:35:42 -0800; There is now a public forum :-) 73, Ward N0AX (tongue in cheek) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00422.html (8,566 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:13:09 -0600; I think Warren's right, to a point. We have all accepted that to grow contesting, we must allow people the chance to grow. So we slow down when called by someone at 15 wpm instead of our 28. We expla; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00425.html (13,845 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:42:01 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ i have certificates on the wall that were won by less than 50 QSOs. The first RTTY contest I ever entered I won the 7th call area by exactly one mult; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00431.html (9,774 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:51:47 -0800; Your argument makes sense and if it were solely a matter of skill, I wouldn't disagree. I like to emphasize knowledge of propagation, strategy and operating technique. To me, those are the heart of h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00432.html (9,959 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 23:23:56 EST; In the 2003 SS SSB, I made almost 200 QSOs on the second radio. It DID make the difference in a number two and three finish. It is a SKILL that takes many hours to get right. I am still working at it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00433.html (8,256 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1): Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 07:00:07 -0500; We all aged 25 years. And you just had to remind me of that didn't you! Dallas W3PP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00437.html (9,345 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 15:52:31 -0000; Back then you had to type a letter to the NCJ or talk about it at Dayton. Now you just have to hit reply all. Randy, K5ZD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00446.html (10,009 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]