Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+Technical\s+Question\s+\-\s+Round\s+II\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technical Question - Round II (score: 1)
Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:00:16 -0800 (PST)
After reading quite a bit on the WWW about SO2R.... I am assuming that you place band pass filters (what ever ilk) in line with BOTH radios. That being the case (if it is) then using bandpass filters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00349.html (8,043 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technical Question - Round II (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:56:36 +0500
You can use one set of filters because each of you rigs is on different band at any given time. 2 SIX PACKS from WX0B and one set of filters (W3NQN filters are the best choice) can do the job. But se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00351.html (11,235 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technical Question - Round II (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:16:53 -0500
Radios are already, only with a very few exceptions, very good for harmonics on the output. I wouldn't waste a filter there. Typically I find them 60 dB down or more. The real problems on TX are the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00354.html (9,301 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technical Question - Round II (score: 1)
Author: Jim Idelson <k1ir@designet.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:31:43 -0500
Lee, You've just begun to scratch the surface of the interstation interference problem. There are a lot of things going on, and the filters actually serve multiple purposes. Rather than go into it he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00359.html (10,764 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technical Question - Round II (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:51:38 -0000
and eliminating the broadband noise that synthesized radios transmit both below and above the band they are transmitting on. Not really. The second harmonic of 40 might be 40 dB down, but the 20 mete
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00362.html (10,562 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technical Question - Round II (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:12:40 -0500
I went through this here getting ready to duplex on 160. In nearly all radios I've looked at the noise doesn't come from the synthesizers. It comes from the early IF stages in the transmitter just a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00369.html (9,070 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technical Question - Round II (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:00:35 +0000 (GMT)
" ... That means you would have to have filters for 6 bands times 2 or 12 filters. if you were running 160, 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 meters.... " It seems to me that in principle one actually only need
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00371.html (7,518 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu