Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+remote\s+contesting\s*$/: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:22:14 -0700
As the initiator of this thread 3 months ago, I reiterate that (QRQ CW) SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING necessitates Non-traditional Internet type connectivity to pull it off as close as possible to what Tree
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00474.html (9,646 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:53:20 +0100
Well, at least I know where we're starting from :-) If you believe that a QSO can be considered to be a station-to-station event, do you then consider a VOIP call to be an ISP-to-ISP event rather tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00477.html (12,043 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:43:27 -0500
Paul, I think you are choosing to ignore some facts. There's not as much of it and, to the extent that it has been replaced (distance is significant) in the signal path between the operators concerne
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00478.html (13,241 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "David J. Sourdis" <hk1kxa@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:46:26 +0000
Hello, I sent a message before about this thread, but something went wrong and I believe it could not reach the mailing list. In case it was received, my apologies for the repetition. I have seen som
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00481.html (10,028 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:15:04 +0000
It's a problem because the interfaces that allow you to remotely-control your own equipment can easily be designed as PART of your equipment. And yet, you're still going to insist "it's not the same
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00483.html (14,313 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:41:57 EDT
Is my opinion that the intention of this rule is to avoid someone taking advantage of having several antennas in different areas so separated that said antennas would have different propagation condx
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00484.html (9,931 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu