Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+technique\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+technique\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique (score: 1): Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:31:05 -0700; Oooops...you're right...that wouldn't work!!! My apologies to the *real* "SO2R" :-) 73... RIck, K6VVA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00090.html (8,122 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:58:43 -0500; Plus, it presupposes that SO2R ops are worthy of special consideration. This isn't a slag against SO2R, as I'm sure most SO2R ops would agree that their run frequency isn't any more guaranteed by vi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00094.html (8,881 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:32:08 -0400; At the risk of being accused of excessive irony, I suggest that anyone who logs a QRP station in a contest should get double QSO points for the extra effort involved, and if the QRP station sends /QR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00097.html (9,542 bytes)
24. [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique (score: 1): Author: "Stephen M. Murphy" <murphys@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 22:37:28 -0400; I'm curious as to what SO2R techniques people are using. Normally, I do the S&P on radio 2 while transmitting on radio 1, but I can only pull this off when the rate drops, and I've hit the wall in th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00293.html (8,754 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 22:09:06 -0500; Steve, you should make it a point to attend the Contest University next year. There was more good SO2R stuff there than you could ever get anywhere else. Just getting N5TJ out of retirement to speak; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00300.html (9,384 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique (score: 1): Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 20:14:21 -0700; A number of the major Contest Clubs received a copy of our NCCC SO2R CLINIC v1.0 DVD for re-distribution amongst the club members. It contains considerable SO2R Technique options. Our annual regime c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00324.html (8,276 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique (score: 1): Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 00:21:15 -0400; "...Biggest secret? TRlog..." Yes, TRlog is good, but have you tried the Advanced SO2R capabilities of N1MM Logger?? 73, Ted W4NZ Steve, you should make it a point to attend the Contest University ne; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00328.html (9,728 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique (score: 1): Author: "Franki ON5ZO" <on5zo@telenet.be>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:27:52 +0200; I did and together with the MK2R+ I must say that it seemed much harder to *start learning* SO2R than this combo actually makes it. Now becoming good at SO2R, that's another thing... ;o) I took the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00361.html (10,082 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]