Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+vs\s+SO1R\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+vs\s+SO1R\s*$/: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:42:32 -0400; The top 25 players (according to 3830scores.com) in the NAQP CW contest were running SO2R. Congrats to N9NB a SO1R op who broke the chain of SO2R scores.. The concern I saw was that there were no SO1; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00058.html (7,452 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 19:20:52 +0000; The best I ever did in NAQP with one radio was about 850 Q's. 85/hr from up here for 10 hours ain't bad. The first time I ran SO2R...the FIRST time....I made well over 1100 Q's. That was before I had; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00069.html (8,929 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:45:07 -0700; K6SRZ is a superb operator with a modest station about 100 miles N of me. He never works SO2R, while I nearly always do. In most contests that we're both taking seriously, he usually beats me by 10-2; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00071.html (8,157 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: "Henning" <mail@oz1bii.dk>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:11:15 +0200; To clarify: SO1R = Single Operator 1 Radio SO2R = Single Operator 2 Radioes Radio = Receiver AND Transmitter. Vy 73 de OZ1BII Henning -- - - - - - - -- --Oprindelig meddelelse-- Fra: CQ-Contest [mail; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00072.html (8,576 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 16:33:50 -0400; Hi Steve, Excellent numbers in NAQP! Yes this contest is perfect for SO2R. I think that SO2R ops are amazing and it should be used and enjoyed. 73s Dave AFP -- Dave Edmonds PK Ministry Webs 864.288.6; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00073.html (9,508 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 21:12:08 +0000; Hi Dave In answer to your questions Is a category for number of receivers needed in the world of contesting? No - the name of the event is Contest - "an event in which people compete for supremacy in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00076.html (10,578 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: "Alan M. Eshleman" <doctore@well.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT); Thanks for the nice words, Jim. My personal opinion is that SO2R and SO1R should be separate categories in all contests. 73, Alan, K6SRZ K6SRZ is a superb operator with a modest station about 100 mil; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00077.html (9,000 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 17:19:56 -0400; Excellent comments Trent! Dave AFP -- Dave Edmonds PK Ministry Webs 864.288.6678 dave@pkministrywebs.com www.pkministrywebs.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00078.html (11,568 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 18:18:56 -0400; Thanks Bob... I've never had scores anywhere near your excellent NAQP scores, but I still love to compete as I can with anyone... SO1R, SO2R or SO3V etc... They usually are up there on the top, but o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00079.html (11,637 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: K8IA via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 17:51:07 -0400; I have always enjoyed NAQP CW and competing with the SO2R crowd is fun. I would never want to see SO2R and SO1R as separate categories. They should not be. The SO2R ops skills should be rewarded. Con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00084.html (10,597 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 21:30:29 -0500; And don't forget with the Yaesu FTDX9000 series you can run full duplex-transmit on one band while listening on another at the same time. You would still be single op-1 radio, though, because it is o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00089.html (11,846 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 21:33:21 -0500; A much bigger difference in scores instead of SO1R vs SO2R would be directional antennas vs non-directional antennas. No contest has this broken down into separate categories. The CQWPX does have the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00090.html (12,406 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 20:03:20 -0700; Caution on nice FT9000 radios.. .. be sure to have a way to protect your second rcvr function when xmit on one band and that simultaneously listening built-in rcvr front end needs protection from the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00091.html (13,886 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:21:02 -0400; The Flex-6700 and 6600 can do that as well but they are marketed as SO2R in a box. The experience with N1MM+ is virtually identical to using two radios. Ria, N2RJ ____________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00092.html (13,610 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 06:39:52 -0400; In the NA Sprint CW, Tree N6TR adds a top ten for those with fewer than 6 QSYs during the 4 hour 20/40/80M Sprint. That is in effect a SO1R top ten and it makes it nice to see head to head comparison; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00094.html (8,407 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:14:07 +0000; Dunestars or 5B4AGN works nicely. 73 Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00095.html (15,049 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:21:41 -0400; I don't support the notion we should create new categories just because some folks have developed a skill the rest of us choose not to. Harrison Bergeron, a short story by Kurt Vonnegut, explores thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00096.html (15,247 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:32:43 +0000; I also don't agree with splitting out the category, however to dismiss it simply as a learned skill is inaccurate. One must have a SO2R capable station which takes investment in time and money over a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00097.html (16,502 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:23:48 +0000; I could not agree more with Kelly's comment about operator skills. I wasn't active when the major contests created the assisted category. Why was it added? (If Al Gore was a ham, he would have probab; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00098.html (16,645 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:06:29 -0400; Hi Ria, You're right that it's not merely a learned skill, however skill remains the primary barrier to entry, not equipment. Many hams already have what they need to do SO2R. A second radio, a secon; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00099.html (18,728 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]