Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+without\s+LPT\s+port\s+Was\:\s+RE\:\s+SO2R\s+withKENWOOD\s+Radios\s+\+\+\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+without\s+LPT\s+port\s+Was\:\s+RE\:\s+SO2R\s+withKENWOOD\s+Radios\s+\+\+\+\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CQ-Contest] SO2R without LPT port Was: RE: SO2R withKENWOOD Radios +++ (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:23:02 -0500; OK, extending the notion one further -- could one use a USB-to-parallel cable (cost, ~$17.00) and supply all the signals currently needed by a standard LPT port SO2R box? All you need to do is contro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00333.html (11,517 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]