Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+CW\s+thoughts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+CW\s+thoughts\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Wed Oct 30 12:44:51 2002; The ARRL SS CW contest is coming up this weekend. Hope everyone can make it on. I have had a few thoughts about some of the recent threads and how they apply to the SS. Here they are for anyone to fl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00250.html (11,090 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1): Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com (Georgek5kg@aol.com); Date: Wed Oct 30 17:53:48 2002; Tree, I got flamed a couple of years ago by putting out many many spots without including section information. The flames came from a few stns who were using the spots to find sweeps. If I go assiste; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00254.html (8,699 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Wed Oct 30 18:08:10 2002; Or - how about prefixes only in DX contests (since there isn't any meaningful exchange information?). Tree At subbands (Saturday explain of You're right, Ron. Many U.S. guys called in below 21150. Ta; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00262.html (10,558 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Wed Oct 30 22:56:21 2002; Good for you, George. You are entitled to do whatever you want. Packet during SS is a bottomless pit of lazy operators, and it starts merely hours into the contest. I've witnessed the harassment (*); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00266.html (8,431 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1): Author: slazar19@sgi.net (Spencer Lazar); Date: Thu Oct 31 07:32:14 2002; swords. people an without during the For the newbies, a few sweepstakes hints Tree left out are: 1. If the station you are working sends sect? and you don't know yours, choose from the following: NL,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00276.html (9,657 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1): Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com (Georgek5kg@aol.com); Date: Thu Oct 31 10:08:53 2002; I hope others will know you are joking. The date of your email should be April 1st! George I. Wagner, K5KG Productivity Resources LLC 941-312-9450 941-312-9460 fax 201-415-6044 cell -- StripMime Repo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00282.html (8,184 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Thu Oct 31 10:39:59 2002; It's always April 1st for Dr. Bafoofnik! Zack W9SZ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00290.html (8,325 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1): Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com (Georgek5kg@aol.com); Date: Thu Oct 31 14:22:01 2002; Nat, You have clearly landed on the issue of whether or not to include the section in the spot. Your toungue-in-cheek suggestion of only spotting the prefix in a dx contest actually has some merit; d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00298.html (9,760 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1): Author: MTessmer@axxesstech.com (Mike Tessmer); Date: Thu Oct 31 13:11:27 2002; I don't see this at all. Each and every QSO in SS is valuable. I would think one would want to work anything that is spotted in order to maximize their score. If it turns out to be a mult it's a bon; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00305.html (7,733 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts (score: 1): Author: nat@ajheatwole.com (Nat Heatwole); Date: Wed Oct 2 01:31:15 2002; would maximize Perhaps, but adding the section into the spot certainly doesn't hurt one's score either. 73, Nat, WZ3AR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00312.html (7,572 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]