Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Exchange\s+\-\s+Sending\s+the\s+other\s+guys\s+call\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange - Sending the other guys call. (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Sat Nov 8 08:55:09 1997
One thing that bugged me while making my 250 QSO's was getting answered by someone (I think) and them not sending my callsign. I havnt looked, but isn't part of the exchange in the rules sending the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00181.html (7,889 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange - Sending the other guys call. (score: 1)
Author: wo4o@juno.com (Ric Painter)
Date: Sat Nov 8 09:39:19 1997
I just woke up and haven't had my first cup of coffee yet so perhaps I missed something here but were you the one calling CQ or was he/she? Hey, does that matter? When somebody answers my CQ in SS I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00183.html (9,237 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange - Sending the other guys call. (score: 1)
Author: n4gn@iglou.com (Tim Totten, N4GN)
Date: Sat Nov 8 11:10:03 1997
Now wait a minute. The RULES list the required elements of the exchange, and they say nothing about sending the other guy's call. It's simply not part of the exchange. The EXAMPLE only shows how WJ1U
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00184.html (8,694 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange - Sending the other guys call. (score: 1)
Author: K4OJ@aol.com (K4OJ@aol.com)
Date: Sat Nov 8 13:04:01 1997
<< When you're in S&P mode, there is no REQUIREMENT to send the other guy's call. Although, as Bill alluded, it can be helpful in those cases where the S&P guy has no clue how to get close to zero be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00192.html (8,313 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange - Sending the other guys call. (score: 1)
Author: wo4o@juno.com (Ric Painter)
Date: Sat Nov 8 15:12:07 1997
In SS SSB on 75 meters be prepared for: Whiskey Oink Four Oink Sooooooooooweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep Stakes! Wo4o -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00194.html (7,854 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange - Sending the other guys call. (score: 1)
Author: wo4o@juno.com (Ric Painter)
Date: Sat Nov 8 15:26:43 1997
As I said, anticipating this response in my previous post: 'Someone could (and probably will) argue that only the station answering the CQing station has to do this . . .' It's time to hear from the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00195.html (8,052 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange - Sending the other guys call. (score: 1)
Author: drussell@knox.net (Donald Russell)
Date: Sat Nov 8 16:42:49 1997
I never liked the other station sending my call if I am the cq'ing station, but I may be changing my mind. I always wondered why some stations called me a dupe when I had nothing in the log even clos
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00225.html (8,608 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange - Sending the other guys call. (score: 1)
Author: dave@egh.com (dave@egh.com)
Date: Mon Nov 10 10:56:01 1997
Hi, As log checking becomes more and more precise, it should make sense for the one calling the CQ'er to give his call first before the exchange. In this way, you help prevent a false qso from being
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00248.html (8,467 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu