Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Musings\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Musings\.\.\.\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings... (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:25:38 -0600; I never cared for the speed change within the exchange, either. But if someone lets the whole exchange rip at 45 wpm it's fine with me. One thing I found that really goofs me up ... if I only copy pa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00285.html (12,697 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings... (score: 1): Author: "Warren C. Stankiewicz" <nf1j@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:33:59 -0800; In and among these various discussions about when to QRS... It used to be, once upon a time, the contest rules had "suggested frequencies" for slower speed CW. I suspect they probably evaporated alon; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00287.html (10,528 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings... (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:31:30 -0600; I thought it was common knowledge the slower CW stations gravitate toward the high end of the band... xx.050 and above. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00291.html (11,777 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings... (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:33:57 -0600; What logger are you using? If it's N1MM, you can type the rest of the exchange and when you get the fill, type it at the end. The software knows how to parse the information for you. If you type the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00292.html (13,742 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings... (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:46:43 -0600; Actually I *do* do that.. I've found that when things are slow, even a modest reduction in speed can bring out a noticeable increase in callers. So I'll be running at something like 22-24wpm when som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00294.html (8,954 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings... (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:31:08 -0700; I'd suggest, from my view, that the newcomers... there are days I feel that I fit there quite well... many days in fact.... days that a newcomer would do well to start high in the band... and tune do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00296.html (10,786 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings... (score: 1): Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:58:22 -0500; Why not suggest QRS SS operations on 7100 to 7125, 14101 to 14125 and 21100 to 21125 and just for the future 28100 to 28125? Particularly on 40M, I think this would be a good idea. The SKCC Sprints h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00321.html (11,145 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]