Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Musings\:\s+Sending\s+the\s+CQer\'s\s+callsign\s+back\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS Musings: Sending the CQer's callsign back (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:23:16 -0500
Since it is *not* a required part of the exchange in SS, I only send the CQers callsign back when I think there may be some doubt in who I'm sending to. Several times when S&Ping on 20 there were mul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00237.html (7,675 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] SS Musings: Sending the CQer's callsign back (score: 1)
Author: "PTA_ABD" <wb2abd@roadrunner.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:43:56 -0500
This wasteful practice saved me from having three busted calls ... all dyslexiated by my poor typing. The other station corrected me all three times. Preferable to having a TNX, QSL, NR, GM ( or comb
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00255.html (7,618 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings: Sending the CQer's callsign back (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:55:55 -0800 (PST)
I'd like to thank everyone who sent my call as part of the exchange, and I know at least two where glad they did as I was able to correct them. I would also like to apologize for sending NR as part o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00263.html (9,649 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings: Sending the CQer's callsign back (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:43:21 -0700
I'm one of the guys who would prefer callers didn't send my callsign at the beginning of the exchange when I'm running. They get the insurance against a busted call but I pay the premium in the form
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00266.html (8,536 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu