Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Off\s+Time\s+Calculations\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:36:39 -0800
All - I had meant to get around to publishing something in the NCJ about this, but just never get around to it... And apologies to W2EV for this being posted in an informal place. For anyone who does
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00383.html (11,670 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Off Time Calculations (score: 1)
Author: BruceAA5B@aol.com
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:36:57 EST
It's probably important to note that your generosity doesn't extend any further than that. A 28-minute break in the log is counted as ON time, right? -Bruce __________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00388.html (7,127 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Off Time Calculations (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:02:56 -0600
It's important to note that different contests are processed by different volunteers. It's VERY important in this case, because Tree is being generous with the 29 minute break thing. There was a NAQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00393.html (8,740 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:34:29 -0600
Great writeup and info, Tree. If tracking our on/off times is important enough that it's used by the log checking software in an arbitrary manner (any 30 minute period is an offtime), why is it not o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00394.html (8,868 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:50:44 +0000
Just to be clear...If OnTime minus Offtime equals 31, then I should be OK with the log checkers, right? I'm getting to old to think about seconds and stuff at 0830Z. 73 Steve K0SR ___________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00398.html (7,679 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Off Time Calculations (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:16:45 -0800
Hmm, the "non-Tree volunteer" (I didn't realize that was a category) is me. I log check all of the NAQP logs. As far as the judgment that I "was not as generous about granting amnesty on a 29 minute
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00399.html (10,195 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (score: 1)
Author: K6VVA <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:14:48 -0800
Bravo to Tree for the excellent detailed explanation. This should be published in the NCJ, QST, CQ, and World Radio for starters. Yes, Yes & Yes! Since the difference between 1st & 2nd place in many
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00410.html (8,910 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:48:04 -0800
Locust et al; Would we then require all contestants to have their log computers connected to WWV / NIST (or a central contest-sponsor-provided time server) in order to constantly update and/or correc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00411.html (9,041 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (score: 1)
Author: K6VVA <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:37:43 -0800
Jack, W6FB (Father of the KRC2 Band Decoder), inquired: Yes and No. Big brother would also be 'controlling' a lot of things from Central HQ. Yes, everyone would need to be connected. "No Adjustments
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00413.html (8,924 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:08:34 -0800
AHA, so THIS is what Assisted is really all about... Or is it contesting on the internet without radios. No thanks, I far prefer using my radio and contesting skills. (This coming from a contester wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00415.html (9,543 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:10:14 +0100
In those sporting events all participants go the same distance. So perhaps it would be a helpful start to note our much varying "distances" by simply adding the operation time to the results - and wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00416.html (9,684 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS off time calculations (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 08:50:30 -0600
Rick, Beware of unintended consequences: No more DX-peditions to anywhere but places with internet access? Well, if it has internet access, there's a better chance it already has a ham population, so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00418.html (12,127 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu