Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+SO\s+Unlimited\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+SO\s+Unlimited\s+question\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: k0hb@arrl.org (Hans - K0HB); Date: Fri Jul 30 10:25:20 1999; Tidbit from ARRL: "The Awards Committee has considered and accepted several recommendations from the Contest Advisory Committee which will affect the annual November Sweepstakes. Effective with the 1; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00104.html (8,130 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Fri Jul 30 15:00:54 1999; Yeah, SOA is a ridiculous category for SS. Much worse than SOA in WPX. I'll predict that the SOA entry in SS NEVER wins a division. 73, Ty K3MM Tidbit from ARRL: "The Awards Committee has considered; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00106.html (8,974 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com); Date: Fri Jul 30 15:50:16 1999; << Yeah, SOA is a ridiculous category for SS. Much worse than SOA in WPX. I'll predict that the SOA entry in SS NEVER wins a division. That's not the point of SOA in SS. The point is for all the smal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00107.html (8,929 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri Jul 30 15:15:59 1999; On Friday, July 30, 1999 10:25 AM, Hans - K0HB [SMTP:k0hb@arrl.org] wrote: To get that elusive VY0 station and a clean sweep. Also, packet is like a drug - once you're hooked, you're hooked. Good thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00111.html (9,204 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: k2xr@zajil.net (Dave K2XR); Date: Fri Jul 30 22:34:06 1999; To assure more sweeps. Gotta move those mugs somehow ... Dave K2XR -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00112.html (7,977 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: eraub@hotmail.com (Eric Raub); Date: Fri Jul 30 20:01:24 1999; Sounds like a rule designed for the casual operator in mind. The guy who has a modest station, and can't find those hard to find multipliers (from a midwest prospective) ie. DEL, NWT, and the rare fi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00113.html (10,700 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri Jul 30 21:08:53 1999; SOA (almost) never wins any contest. Doesn't mean it isn't fun... 73 Barry -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00114.html (8,475 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Fri Jul 30 19:11:01 1999; << Besides...the more clean sweeps..the more mugs the ARRL can sell!! I am amazed at the cynical response to this topic. The clean sweep program is largely responsible for the revitalization of SS an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00115.html (10,769 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: rocker@ametro.net (Ray Rocker); Date: Fri Jul 30 16:48:35 1999; The savvy sweep-chaser does not neglect the value of CQing. Some supposedly-rare sections have plenty of casual operators who do nothing but go around answering CQs. You aren't going to find those g; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00116.html (9,110 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sat Jul 31 11:48:21 1999; Boy, I dunno. After missing a sweep last year (again) in SSCW, now that it's legal I might turn on packet Sunday afternoon, when things are slow anyway, to find the missing section. If unlimited stat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00121.html (8,174 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: k0hb@arrl.org (Hans - K0HB); Date: Fri Jul 30 10:25:20 1999; Tidbit from ARRL: "The Awards Committee has considered and accepted several recommendations from the Contest Advisory Committee which will affect the annual November Sweepstakes. Effective with the 1; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00228.html (8,264 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Fri Jul 30 15:00:54 1999; Yeah, SOA is a ridiculous category for SS. Much worse than SOA in WPX. I'll predict that the SOA entry in SS NEVER wins a division. 73, Ty K3MM Tidbit from ARRL: "The Awards Committee has considered; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00230.html (9,084 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com); Date: Fri Jul 30 15:50:16 1999; << Yeah, SOA is a ridiculous category for SS. Much worse than SOA in WPX. I'll predict that the SOA entry in SS NEVER wins a division. That's not the point of SOA in SS. The point is for all the smal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00231.html (9,038 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri Jul 30 15:15:59 1999; On Friday, July 30, 1999 10:25 AM, Hans - K0HB [SMTP:k0hb@arrl.org] wrote: To get that elusive VY0 station and a clean sweep. Also, packet is like a drug - once you're hooked, you're hooked. Good thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00235.html (9,311 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: k2xr@zajil.net (Dave K2XR); Date: Fri Jul 30 22:34:06 1999; To assure more sweeps. Gotta move those mugs somehow ... Dave K2XR -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00236.html (7,860 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: eraub@hotmail.com (Eric Raub); Date: Fri Jul 30 20:01:24 1999; Sounds like a rule designed for the casual operator in mind. The guy who has a modest station, and can't find those hard to find multipliers (from a midwest prospective) ie. DEL, NWT, and the rare fi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00237.html (10,570 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri Jul 30 21:08:53 1999; SOA (almost) never wins any contest. Doesn't mean it isn't fun... 73 Barry -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00238.html (8,349 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Fri Jul 30 19:11:01 1999; << Besides...the more clean sweeps..the more mugs the ARRL can sell!! I am amazed at the cynical response to this topic. The clean sweep program is largely responsible for the revitalization of SS an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00239.html (10,732 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: rocker@ametro.net (Ray Rocker); Date: Fri Jul 30 16:48:35 1999; The savvy sweep-chaser does not neglect the value of CQing. Some supposedly-rare sections have plenty of casual operators who do nothing but go around answering CQs. You aren't going to find those g; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00240.html (9,225 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sat Jul 31 11:48:21 1999; Boy, I dunno. After missing a sweep last year (again) in SSCW, now that it's legal I might turn on packet Sunday afternoon, when things are slow anyway, to find the missing section. If unlimited stat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00245.html (8,093 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]