Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Summary\s+Comments\s+VE4GV\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Summary\s+Comments\s+VE4GV\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS Summary Comments VE4GV (score: 1): Author: rkaufman@videon.wave.ca (Robert Kaufmann); Date: Sun Apr 25 03:40:16 1999; Hi SS Contesters, I just received my summary. Very eye opening to say the least. At 1.7 % error rate, I suppose I can't complain BUT .... I did notice something very unusual about the busts of my cal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00226.html (9,586 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] SS Summary Comments VE4GV (score: 1): Author: W2CE@prodigy.net (W2CE); Date: Sun Apr 25 08:31:39 1999; Strange that all 11 had the exact same error. Except for maybe a multiop error changing ops it seems strange. I wonder if these were together in time, or maybe from a DX cluster area where the wrong; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00234.html (7,682 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] SS Summary Comments VE4GV (score: 1): Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III); Date: Sun Apr 25 07:30:47 1999; At first glance this might seem strange but, I dont see it that way. For two years I worked at a job where I was on the telephone issuing permits. I had to give people detailed information that they; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00237.html (8,744 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] SS Summary Comments VE4GV (score: 1): Author: eraub@umr.edu (Eric Raub); Date: Sun Apr 25 12:29:06 1999; The Univ of MO-Rolla station, W0EEE, was one that copied the Ck as 67 instead of 72. Unfortunately, the contact was our only Mb QSO, thus dropping us from having a clean sweep. For the record, we did; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00242.html (9,427 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] SS Summary Comments VE4GV (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Sun Apr 25 14:17:22 1999; Another theory: 6 and 7 are right next to each other on the keyboard. The person hears 72, the right index finger is a little to the left of the '7' key, somehow getting '6' first then the desired '7; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00246.html (7,682 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] SS Summary Comments VE4GV (score: 1): Author: K9NW@aol.com (K9NW@aol.com); Date: Sun Apr 25 16:11:30 1999; << Observation #2 11 of the 50 errors in other peoples logs were miscopies of my Ck year. They ALL said it was 67 rather than the correct 72. This is very suspicious. While my pronunciation may have; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00248.html (7,765 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]