Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+checking\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+checking\.\.\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com); Date: Sun Mar 7 00:34:57 1999; Wow! Cant belive the hit I took in CW SS after the check. Not real bad, but bad enough that I picked it apart to tell poor typing & poor copy apart. Guess what? I need a typing class -- and I need to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00067.html (7,737 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: miltj@aepnet.com (Milt Jensen, N5IA); Date: Sun Mar 7 06:16:05 1999; Does this mean that every unique is to be DQed? Or does it mean that you have to identify the unique(s) in a listing on your Summary Sheet? 73 de MIlt, N5IA lost it -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00072.html (7,765 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: k0xq@amsat.org (Sean Warner K0XQ); Date: Sun Mar 7 15:09:12 1999; If I read it right, a call has to show up in at least 4 logs or it gets bounced out. Even though team KT0R got beat up pretty bad by the new log checking software, I think we all agree that it is a g; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00074.html (8,425 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sun Mar 7 15:37:07 1999; I had one callsign not in the database, but because he gave me #1 (I think), it was not questioned. My three busted calls were deleted and penalties charged. Seems fair to me, particularly since the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00076.html (8,479 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sun Mar 7 15:43:00 1999; ... Not my understanding -- I had one ultra-unique, not in the database at all, but it was kept because he gave me #1. It would be helpful, though, to have the criteria explicitly stated. 73, Pete Sm; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00077.html (8,165 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Sun Mar 7 10:49:17 1999; Well, Mr. Bill, looks like the world disagrees with you on this one. We can't stop the progress of how technology affects contesting. N6AA ran this kind of a program during WRTC for the competitors.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00078.html (9,256 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: W2CE@prodigy.net (W2CE); Date: Sun Mar 7 13:10:20 1999; There can be many reason for uniques and people giving out very low numbers. My own eample was being mobile yesterday and not having a log going in traffic. I used a club call for which I am trustee; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00082.html (9,301 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: k9zm@frontiernet.net (Greg Gobleman); Date: Sun Mar 7 13:14:18 1999; snip: So, since I haven't seriously worked a contest in a long time and I get on to have some fun between Honey-do's and work 20 or so and only 3 submit a log, they get penalized because I didn't sub; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00083.html (8,787 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: n0ss@socket.net (Tom Hammond); Date: Sun Mar 7 13:50:10 1999; I echo these comments. I was in the 5-percenters club, and not happy about it. But it goes to show me where I really need to put my efforts in improving my contesting skills. I'll do better (hopefull; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00085.html (8,524 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: k0hb@uswest.net (Radio K0HB); Date: Sun Mar 7 21:07:41 1999; Whoa! Hold it right there, Pilgrim! I haven't seen anything in the rules which says "you must show up in at least 4 logs or you don't count". In fact, if that is so, it takes away a tried-and-true SS; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00087.html (10,713 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: k0xq@amsat.org (Sean Warner K0XQ); Date: Sun Mar 7 22:47:17 1999; K0HB replied: "The callsigns listed after the dupe check are the ones that didn't make it into the database. The criteria for a call to show up in the database is that it must show up in at least 4 o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00088.html (9,473 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Edward W. Sleight); Date: Mon Mar 8 00:00:12 1999; sniped -- This line of reasoning stinks! It is highly probable that a station could make 10 or more QSOs just with guys looking for States, who never submit a log. Where is it written you have to wor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00090.html (9,560 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: miltj@aepnet.com (Milt Jensen, N5IA); Date: Sun Mar 7 17:56:36 1999; Hello Sean, Where do you read this? Seems strange to me!! 73 de Milt, N5IA -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00091.html (7,872 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: k0hb@uswest.net (Radio K0HB); Date: Mon Mar 8 03:51:15 1999; As I read that, calls can be absent for the database for two reasons: 1) They are judged incorrect. 2) They were found in less than 4 logs. In all the explanations I've see so far, it isn't clear to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00096.html (9,841 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: dhenderson@arrl.org (Henderson, Dan N1ND); Date: Mon Mar 8 08:11:28 1999; The statement below, is not correct. Dan Henderson, N1ND Contest Branch Manager, ARRL snip: -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00101.html (8,024 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon Mar 8 10:06:22 1999; Dan, is there a definitive description of how a call gets bounced from a log? There has been too much speculation on this reflector - can we hear from someone who KNOWS? Mike N2MG -- CQ-Contest on WW; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00103.html (7,952 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1): Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough); Date: Mon Mar 8 10:13:37 1999; This will be the topic of an upcoming NCJ article. --Trey, N5KO -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00104.html (7,566 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]