Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SSB\s+\&\s+CW\s+On\s+Same\s+Band\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SSB\s+\&\s+CW\s+On\s+Same\s+Band\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: Tom Hellem <tom.hellem@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 19:54:50 -0600; Has anyone successfully run 2 stations on same band, SSB &CW, without interference between the two? For example, FD or IARU. We have tried it several times and have always ended up with moderate to s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00466.html (7,279 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 14:51:46 -0400 (EDT); Hi Tom, The W3AO Field Day team has used multiple transmitters in the same band for more then 20 years with no trace of interference at all. We often have four transmitters on the same band (CW, SSB,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00468.html (9,688 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:20:30 -0500; Great question !!! Eager to hear some answers steve http://www.KG5VK.com My Ham Radio Friends _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00471.html (8,789 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:19:01 -0500; When it comes to this problem, have these new rigs really become this susceptible to this problem? I mean Honestly, I remember fondly running my Drake TR-4 as the Novice station for our club 1976 Fie; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00473.html (8,592 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 21:20:25 +0000; I was also curious about the techniques used at PJ2G and was pointed in the direction of this product. https://www.dxengineering.com/search/product-line/dx-engineering-receiver-guard-electronic-rf-li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00474.html (9,630 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:05:55 -0700; Hi Tom, We've been doing it for years at the 500W level on our CQP county expeditions. I've even done it at home with 1.5kW. The keys to doing it are 1) equipment with very clean transmitters; 2) equ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00476.html (9,707 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:50:52 -0400; Some of the SO2R operators run 2 radios on one band and I believe MOST of the mult-ops do. I do here at N1UR. I use cross polarization (transmit vertically on 160 and listen horizontally - and transm; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00480.html (8,843 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:25:59 -0500; Ed and Jim Thank You very much for the specifics As one that is still in the early building stage of my new antenna farm in Texas I really appreciate the details you both just provided The Spacing gu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00485.html (11,725 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: Andy Blank <andyn2nt@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:15:14 -0400; Hi Ed. Just to clarify about the CQ 160 contest; The option for remote receivers is available ONLY in SO Assisted category. It is not permitted in Single Op or Multi Op. It's inclusion was in direct; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00492.html (10,888 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:38:23 -0700; I am also building an 80m Rhombic on the back 24 acres of property progress is slow, it won't be high but hopefully it will be an asset in ARRL SS from North Texas If you're on the west coast or KH6/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00498.html (13,848 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB & CW On Same Band (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:59:05 -0400; Andy, Thanks for this clarification. Understood. I still think it is a slippery slope and a mistake, even for the assisted category. Especially with more and more people calling for merger of unassis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00501.html (11,456 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]