Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+STUFF\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: n6tj@sbcglobal.net (James Neiger)
Date: Sat Jan 25 08:29:56 2003
I marvel at those skilled in SO2R. Maybe I'll be proficient by the time I'm 70 (soon). Or not. Meanwhile, please, let's leave these fellows alone; perhaps we can shut our mouths, open our minds, and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00329.html (7,436 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: k0hb@earthlink.net (KØHB
Date: Sat Jan 25 17:19:31 2003
I agree. Let's do away with ASSISTED. If you use packet you go into the "multi-op" category. Packet isn't a skill like SO2R, it's a crutch like super-check-partial. 73, de Hans, K0HB RadioSport Minne
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00331.html (7,970 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry )
Date: Sat Jan 25 19:17:47 2003
So anyone who uses supercheck partial should be a multiop, too? -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00335.html (8,352 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Sat Jan 25 19:24:22 2003
99.9% of the time I agree with the very astute Mr. Nieger, however, this time I must make an exception. DO AWAY with packet for all categories. How much of a 'CONTEST' is it if you know what frequenc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00337.html (8,934 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: ua9cdc@r66.ru (Igor Sokolov)
Date: Sun Jan 26 01:05:44 2003
time I'm alone; So have this the And computer logging and sending... 73, Igor UA9CDC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00340.html (8,599 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: k0hb@earthlink.net (KØHB
Date: Sat Jan 25 20:59:12 2003
Absolutely!!!! Supercheck-partial is outside assistance, like contestants having a dictionary at the national spelling bee. Also logging programs that automagically fill in the zone in CQWW. 73, de H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00343.html (7,364 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)
Date: Sat Jan 25 16:28:52 2003
I disagree. I've done multi-ops and an occasional assisted operation in the past, and it's no cakewalk to try to work that spoonfed list of DX stations that hundreds are already calling. While operat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00345.html (7,601 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: paul@ei5di.com (Paul O'Kane)
Date: Sat Jan 25 21:41:35 2003
And while we're at it, why not let single-ops receive assistance over the phone, and via multiple simultaneous internet clusters - after all, it's simply using the available technology? Nonsense - it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00346.html (7,660 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: steve@oakcom.com (Steve Maki)
Date: Sat Jan 25 20:41:20 2003
And if your super-check partial database is created from your own logs only? There is an infinite number of possibilities across the "gray area", just wondering where you draw the line. 73, Steve K8L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00354.html (7,573 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG)
Date: Sat Jan 25 21:28:10 2003
All the logging programs I know do that anyway, but since zones were not checked by CQ the last I heard, this is probably moot. IMO, one gets far more benefit from having the PC send CW, than from ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00355.html (7,367 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] STUFF (score: 1)
Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones)
Date: Sat Jan 25 19:55:10 2003
I can't say that I agree with either side of this exchange. Frankly, I find a number of operating practices that are common now to be an annoyance. I don't enjoy passing multipliers band to band, and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00357.html (10,151 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu