Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SWBC\s+stations\s+in\s+7100\-7300\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SWBC\s+stations\s+in\s+7100\-7300\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SWBC stations in 7100-7300 (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:01:14 -0400; Maybe I'm just being pessimistic, but I'd be surprised if you notice much difference in the BC QRM in that segment over the near term. There's little incentive to wait until the magic turnover date i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00132.html (8,841 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWBC stations in 7100-7300 (score: 1): Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>; Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:50:58 +0100; I was cq-ing around 7100, got almost no attention. For me the frequency sounded clear. I moved to the noisy 7099 and I got a pile up. Would be nice if USA station would also listen a bit higher then; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00133.html (9,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]