Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sad\s+prop\s+forecast\s+for\s+the\s+next\s+few\s+years\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sad\s+prop\s+forecast\s+for\s+the\s+next\s+few\s+years\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: Bill kollenbaum via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 20:04:05 +0000 (UTC); (SWPC). Panel. 2018 09 4.1 5.1 3.1 69.9 70.9 68.9 2018 10 4.4 6.4 2.4 69.6 70.6 68.6 2018 11 4.5 7.5 1.5 69.1 71.1 67.1 2018 12 4.3 9.3 0.0 68.5 71.5 65.5 2019 01 4.4 9.4 0.0 68.0 72.0 64.0 2019 02; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00161.html (11,060 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: Bill via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 01:28:46 +0000 (UTC); Looks grim. How to keep the fun going? CQWW: Time to let the member states of the USA work each other for points just like the member states of the EU now work each other for points. WPX: 1 point for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00163.html (7,438 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 07:09:16 -0500; The sky is not falling. I am still working stuff on 10 meters. The low bands are good. Maybe people will get on 6 meters where there is a surprising amount of DX. Chuck W5PR _________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00165.html (7,996 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: Björn Ekelund <bjorn@ekelund.nu>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 14:47:10 +0100; Could not agree more. I've worked almost 260 DXCC and 1500 Challenge Points with 500W and a dipole since I returned to ham radio less than three years ago. The trick is to simply ignore the spot coun; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00166.html (9,139 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: robert <wa1fcn@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:28:15 -0500; GM Bill I hope we do not have 3 more years of no sunspots! 73 BoB WA1FCN CQWW: Time to let the member states of the USA work each other for points just like the member states; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00168.html (8,700 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:32:27 -0600; And I haven't turned my radio on in the last year except for CQWW and ARRL DX CW contests... Barry W2UP The trick is to simply ignore the spot count. 73, Björn SM7IUN Den lör 23 mars 2019 kl 14:31 sk; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00169.html (10,232 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 13:06:24 -0600; Bill, You have made other statements about the demise of contesting. It's not happening. For example, 2900 QSO's from New Mexico in ARRL DX CW a few weekends ago. No sunspots. Great fun. 73, Steve, N; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00171.html (9,767 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 20:59:43 -0500; Agreed, I am having more fun contesting now than ever. 73 - Mark N5OT You have made other statements about the demise of contesting. It's not happening. For example, 2900 QSO's from New Mexico in ARR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00176.html (10,225 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 00:49:09 -0400; Time to book a trip to the Caribbean :) It's always good there! Jeff KU8E I am having more fun contesting now than ever. 73 - Mark N5OT You have made other statements about the demise of contesting.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00178.html (11,590 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: Vytenis Sciucka <vytenis.sciucka@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:38:30 +0200; Predicted values are based on the consensus of the Solar Cycle 24 Prediction Panel *We predict that SC25 will be about slightly smaller (95%) the strength of SC24, making it the weakest solar cycle i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00179.html (9,357 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:12:20 -0500; The sun may be overrated. Maybe if we burn more fossil fuels shortwave radio conditions will improve. K1TN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00181.html (8,122 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sad prop forecast for the next few years (score: 1): Author: "steve.root" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:29:53 -0400 (EDT); The guys who are still seeing propagation on the "UHF" bands like 15 and 10 meters all live in the southern tier of states. Up here 10 meters is dead and gone and won't be useful for years. 73 Steve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00182.html (8,743 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]