Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Second\s+Century\s+of\s+Radio\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:26:21 +0100
In the ARRL Contest Update for May 27, N0AX ends his "Pushing the Envelope" section with the words "Welcome to the second century of radio!" where, presumably, it will be the norm for us to be active
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00240.html (7,783 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 08:45:12 -0500
Sorry, I'm a RADIO amateur. I'm into RADIOsport, So I, for one, won't be in anyone's logs in those contests. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00241.html (9,776 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:12:22 -0400
I think your second principle is too restrictive. I'd suggest instead that we need to define a "bright line" to separate ham radio contesting from whatever this CQ100 business is about. The analogy t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00242.html (8,993 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:13:15 -0800
Second the motion, Paul. Somewhere in the mix of RadioSport contesting categories we MUST keep a preserve where "a boy and his radio" competes ONLY with other similarly inclined aficionados. We simp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00244.html (8,695 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:55:13 -0400
Although my personal preference would be to find something else to do with my time, we could call it telegraphy-sport. Since my major interest is in actual radio, I'd find such a thing to be mind num
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00245.html (8,648 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: "Hal Kennedy" <halken@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:22:55 -0800
Why simulate radio when we all have radio? 73, Hal N4GG _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00252.html (7,310 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:48:44 +0000
N4ZR replied to EI5DI: What was already in some contest rules: the bit about how the single operator is to do all the functions of operating: finding, working & logging stations. It's this activity t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00257.html (10,328 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: "WT2P - C. Johnson" <fredwt2p@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 23:44:14 -0400
Some brief observations: A thought popped into my mind, and perhaps we can borrow a page from other "sports" if you will regarding this. Would Nascar be the same if everyone was sitting in their inte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00258.html (9,093 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:24:17 -0700
I'd think this would be about as much fun as a colonoscopy. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00259.html (8,311 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:31:38 -0500
Lack of sunspots? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00261.html (8,629 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: Mike <nf4l_NO_SPAM@nf4l.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:08:42 -0400
At least the colonoscopy patient gets anesthesia..... 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00267.html (8,354 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:57:22 -0800
If there's no radio involved, then it's not radio contesting, regardless of the century it happens in. CQ100 is a computer game, not amateur radio, and the CQ100 contest is not radio contesting, it'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00276.html (10,380 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu