Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Self\s+spotting\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Self\s+spotting\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: Mark <markzl3ab@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 03:29:01 +0000; As you may know we have all sorts of issues in this part of the world with getting people to turn their beams in a contest. So if I come across a station calling CQ who clearly cannot hear me, is it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00010.html (6,970 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:43:24 +0000; It is not self-spotting if you are spotting another station - Maybe us down under contesters need to be smarter and spot all our S&P QSOs - it is a feature of N1MM Cheers Trent VK4TS usually @VK4KW A; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00011.html (8,024 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:40:15 -0500; Of course, if you are calling CQ in a CW or RTTY contest, you are automatically spotted on the reverse beacon network, assuming at least two stations listening get your transmission. It even spots yo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00012.html (9,565 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:31:24 -0600; That is not self spotting. I spot lots of things that I don't work or can't work or stations I already worked in contests and outside contests. Who knows if the op will see and understand the mean; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00014.html (8,472 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:16:31 -0400; Not self spotting... but may seem questionable if it's on your frequency. 73 Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00015.html (9,763 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Milam, N9KY" <N9KY@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:33:38 -0500; Now if we could just get people to stop using S&P mode in N1MM when they're actually running, that would be great. You can always tell it's happening when you see 25 juicy new ones suddenly pile up o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00017.html (9,834 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 14:38:35 -0500; I guess that can happen one of two ways, Yes N1MM+ BUT..... not in ESM mode, In ESM it will change to Run automatically. OR, People not thinking all the way through Thinking when they see the Spot a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00020.html (11,040 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 02:52:39 +0500; Mike, Does it mean that you narrow the meaning of self spotting to runners only. Therefore when doing S&P , I hear needed mult and have difficulties to get him, I can send a spot with comment " Turn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00021.html (10,477 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 08:26:36 +0700; I agree with ZL3AB. There are parts of the world that need spotting AS NEGLECTED GEOGRAPHIC PLACES, not to promote a specific call sign. 73, Charly HS0ZCW -- Charly, HS0ZCW __________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00022.html (9,053 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 18:19:23 -0600; I am not doing anything other than giving an opinion. The contest folks make the rules. That might help expose those claiming unassisted though.......Tell them to turn their antenna and the do and w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00023.html (11,628 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 23:42:45 -0400; I believe that this violates CQWW General Rule IX 8 "All requests for contacts, responses to calls, and copying of call signs and contest exchanges must be accomplished during the contest period usin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00024.html (8,985 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting? (score: 1): Author: "Holger Hannemann" <holger@9h3m.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 09:54:11 +1300; Hi We were spotting a lot in the last WWDX SSB as for some reason the setting "spot all when S&P" was active for many hours. We spotted stations worked and stations that would still not hear us. We f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00026.html (10,044 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting? (score: 1): Author: Mark <markzl3ab@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:03:54 +1300; "I believe that this violates CQWW General Rule IX 8 "All requests for contacts, responses to calls, and copying of call signs and contest exchanges must be accomplished during the contest period usi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00028.html (9,040 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting? (score: 1): Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 00:04:42 +0000; Would really depend what you spot Mark, If you spotted XX1XX on 14.175 fair call whether you worked them is irrelevant If you spotted XX1XX on 14.175 and said turn your beams to ZL and I will be ther; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00036.html (10,471 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting? (score: 1): Author: "Lyubomir Slavov, OR2F" <on8lds@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 21:02:59 +0100; Hi Mark, IMHO - it's quite dangerous to spot somebody before you have him in the log ... this could create a pile-up on his frequency, i.e. drops down your chance at all. ... In general, what about i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00093.html (9,033 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting? (score: 1): Author: MARK BAILEY <kd4d@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 08:12:11 -0500 (EST); Hi everyone: I do not want to see ANY rules that would require single operators to connect to the internet (or other outside networks) to be competitive. The Assisted and multi-operator classes are d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00106.html (10,904 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting? (score: 1): Author: MARK BAILEY <kd4d@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 08:10:04 -0500 (EST); Hi Leo: I am not in favor of allowing self-spotting for single operators. I do not want to see ANY rules that would reqto connect to the internet (or other outside networks) for single operators to b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00108.html (10,261 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting? (score: 1): Author: Mark <markzl3ab@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 13:08:10 +1300; Hi Leo If a pile up makes the DX station turn his beam that is fine by me. Normally it isn't an issue anyway as in most situations they are calling CQ with no takers - which makes it doubly frustrati; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00146.html (10,589 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]