Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sending\s+Speed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sending\s+Speed\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sending Speed (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:15:31 -0700; In the recent CW Sprint, I am losing two QSOs (with additional two QSOs worth of penalties) because I didn't QRS enough (or at all). The station I was working asked for a repeat - but I didn't hear i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00215.html (7,148 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Speed (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:09:52 -0500; One thing that I noticed from the last sprint was that more stations seemed to be waiting for a confirmation from the departing op before pouncing on the one taking over the frequency. That saved me; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00219.html (8,638 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Speed (score: 1): Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>; Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 08:18:46 -0500; Thanks for the 'di-dit', Kelly (and everyone else who sent 'di-dit' to ack the report). A wouf hong across the brow to the two or three ops who left the QRG without so much as a 'dit' to ack my repo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00236.html (7,591 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]