Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sending\s+the\s+other\s+guy\'s\s+call\s+\-\s+AGAIN\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sending\s+the\s+other\s+guy\'s\s+call\s+\-\s+AGAIN\!\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sending the other guy's call - AGAIN!! (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:54:51 -0800; The CQ 160 contest is one that will go down in history. Many records were broken. However, along with that went really bad QRM as the narrow spectrum available to places like Europe and Japan were pa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00231.html (10,869 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending the other guy's call - AGAIN!! (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:39:36 -0800 (PST); Amen to that Tree! If in doubt, send both calls... But I always find it helpful in extremely congested situations if the replying station leads off with my call, versus theirs. No questions then... T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00232.html (13,488 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending the other guy's call - AGAIN!! (score: 1): Author: "Charles W. Shaw" <chasshaw@leaco.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:13:15 +0000; Certainly worth repeating, and there is a need to pass this info better to those outside this reflector! YES! One of my most common thoughts when running. I can do the other extreme, but I prefer to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00235.html (7,941 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]