Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Serial\s+number\,\s+contact\s+sending\s+speed\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: NM5M <nm5meric@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:58:31 -0500
Dont forget, in the Russian contest, the contest sponsor penalizes stations if the receiving party doesnt get the information correctly into their log. To simplify, both stations have to copy correct
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00042.html (44,066 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:05:23 -0400
I thought you had to have correct information in your log for contacts in any contest... So which contests allow us to do half the job? Dave AFP -- Dave Edmonds PK Ministry Webs 864.288.6678 dave@pkm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00045.html (49,712 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:41:09 -0400
In Russian dx test both sides need proper QSO otherwise nobody gets credit. Other contests allow one side to have a busted QSO. Ria N2RJ -- Ria Jairam, N2RJ Director, Hudson Division ARRL - The natio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00046.html (57,079 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 13:43:05 -0500
Most contests don't penalize the SENDING station when the RECEIVING station doesn't write it down correctly. Chuck W5PR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00047.html (56,793 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:43:08 -0400
CQ WW. All you need is the correct callsign for 99.99% of the contacts. The logger does the rest. Gerry W1VE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00048.html (57,010 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:20:41 +0300
Eric, this is a very valid point. Some people like it, others not. I belong to the first category - not because I am Russian but simply because this adds a new dimension to overall skills in a contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00049.html (51,147 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 13:25:59 -0600
Wow. Some folks need to learn to trim their messages. All contests allow half the job. Remember those silly 59, 599 reports. Doug "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00051.html (8,936 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:37:30 -0500
Most all other contests. If you call ZF9CW and I log you as WN4AFO, you get credit and I don't. If I log you as Zone 4 with correct call you get credit and I don't. In Russian Contest both operators
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00052.html (54,876 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:40:52 -0600
Not so for the non-USA side of CQWW. You have to get the zone correct for worked USA stations. My (preliminary) LCR from operating N2IC @ N3HBX showed nearly 900 QSO's relied on their databases to in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00056.html (63,605 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:52:18 -0600
That's why I don't operate the RDXC. Getting dinged for the other guy's inability to copy isn't right. Barry W2UP Other contests allow one side to have a busted QSO. Ria N2RJ I thought you had to hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00059.html (62,776 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 19:58:45 -0400
Stan must have used Super Check Partial to obtain the WN4 prefix:) John KK9A Most all other contests. If you call ZF9CW and I log you as WN4AFO, you get credit and I don't. If I log you as Zone 4 wit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00060.html (8,823 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:04:48 +0500
It is just different philosophy Barry. Two way QSO means correct info in both logs. For the duration of a QSO you are partners with the op on the other side, responsible for the correct 2 way transfe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00067.html (67,173 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:57:55 +0000 (UTC)
It's like Original Sin.  You are damned by default.   And it's difficult to be redeemed in a contest environment, especially on a sin by sin (QSO by QSO) basis. 73, Ken, AB1J It is just different phi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00071.html (10,393 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:00:56 -0400
That really depends. Russian and French (TO/TM) calls come to mind. Ria N2RJ -- Ria Jairam, N2RJ Director, Hudson Division ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio +1.973.594.6275 https://hu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00072.html (63,671 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:04:53 -0400
What if the other person not sure, deletes your call from their log? You end up losing that QSO. I don't have insight into log checking but I'd imagine that if the computer can determine that the cal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00074.html (61,326 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:02:14 +0000 (UTC)
And that depends on whether you keep your wl_cty.dat file up to date.  Take a look at it. 73,Ken, AB1J That really depends. Russian and French (TO/TM) calls come to mind. Ria N2RJ --Original Message-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00075.html (65,193 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:45:34 -0400
While I do update it immediately before the contest, sometimes stations come up with a brand new callsign for a contest. I know this has happened before. 73 Ria, N2RJ -- Ria Jairam, N2RJ Director, Hu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00078.html (71,004 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: yuri <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:50:27 -0400
Actually, it was after I received a UBN for the 2001 Russian DX Contest when I decided to change my very good VA3UZ call for current - available at that moment (and not-so-good) VE3DZ. A couple of hu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00082.html (11,452 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:42:00 +0500
True, but no additional penalties though. On the other hand, if in CQWPX of other contest with similar approach, I call you and you get my call as UA9CBC instead of UA9CDC, what is the incentive (exc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00085.html (10,480 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 20:47:05 -0600
I recall a CQWW CW 10+ years ago where I was dinged for a busted call.  I had recorded the contest and went back to listen to the exchange.  The guy sent his own call wrong!  I sent the audio snippet
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00086.html (12,429 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu