- 1. [CQ-Contest] Single Op Multi Station in CQ 160 CW (score: 1)
- Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:47:07 EST
- As most of you know, the CQ 160 meter CW contest is this weekend. A notable difference between the CQ and ARRL 160 meter contests is that CQ does not have the ARRL's fixation about the use of more th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00320.html (7,529 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Multi Station in CQ 160 CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:25:57 -0600
- Wouldn't you rather for me to just call you ten times in a row, with each of my and my friends callsigns, give you 10 QSOs, and then repeat for the next guy that can hear me? Isn't that a lot more ef
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00324.html (7,569 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Multi Station in CQ 160 CW (score: 1)
- Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:44:32 EST
- Wouldn't you rather for me to just call you ten times in a row, with each of my and my friends callsigns, give you 10 QSOs, and then repeat for the next guy that can hear me? Isn't that a lot more ef
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00325.html (7,850 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu